LCORE-1880: Refactor of 413 response

[asimurka]

Description

This PR refactors 413 error response model:

• Returns 413 back into query and streaming_query OpenAPI specification
• Adds new example that corresponds to the actual exception being raised
• Removes custom cause from __init__() method to avoid using custom causes

Type of change

• Refactor
• New feature
• Bug fix
• CVE fix
• Optimization
• Documentation Update
• Configuration Update
• Bump-up service version
• Bump-up dependent library
• Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
• CI configuration change
• Konflux configuration change
• Unit tests improvement
• Integration tests improvement
• End to end tests improvement
• Benchmarks improvement

Tools used to create PR

Identify any AI code assistants used in this PR (for transparency and review context)

• Assisted-by: N/A

Related Tickets & Documents

• Related Issue # LCORE-1880
• Closes #

Checklist before requesting a review

• I have performed a self-review of my code.
• PR has passed all pre-merge test jobs.
• If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Testing

• Please provide detailed steps to perform tests related to this code change.
• How were the fix/results from this change verified? Please provide relevant screenshots or results.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@asimurka has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 34 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 34 minutes and 43 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5fe9f2ef-4337-452f-89b2-4d976769c77f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 75a4495 and b2e31ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)

• docs/openapi.json
• src/app/endpoints/query.py
• src/app/endpoints/responses.py
• src/app/endpoints/rlsapi_v1.py
• src/app/endpoints/streaming_query.py
• src/models/responses.py
• tests/unit/models/responses/test_error_responses.py

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

✨ Simplify code

• Create PR with simplified code

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[tisnik]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 Security concerns No followed all instructions

⚡ No major issues detected

[tisnik]

LGTM