[MISC] Miscellaneous spelling fixes

[JonahSussman]

Description

Walking through the repository, I noticed some spelling errors. This PR fixes them.

Note that I believe the e2e tests failing is wholly unrelated to my changes.

Type of change

• Refactor
• New feature
• Bug fix
• CVE fix
• Optimization
• Documentation Update
• Configuration Update
• Bump-up service version
• Bump-up dependent library
• Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
• CI configuration change
• Konflux configuration change
• Unit tests improvement
• Integration tests improvement
• End to end tests improvement

Related Tickets & Documents

• Related Issue: None
• Closes: None

Checklist before requesting a review

• I have performed a self-review of my code.
• PR has passed all pre-merge test jobs.
• If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Testing

• Please provide detailed steps to perform tests related to this code change.

N/A

• How were the fix/results from this change verified? Please provide relevant screenshots or results.

N/A

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Corrected multiple typographical errors in user-facing documentation and comments to improve clarity and accuracy.
• Style
  • Updated log messages and docstrings to fix spelling mistakes for better readability.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This update addresses minor typographical errors across documentation, log messages, comments, and docstrings in both source and test files. No changes were made to application logic, control flow, or exported entities. All modifications are strictly textual, improving clarity and correctness of written content.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation Fixes README.md	Corrected "indepth knowledge" to "in-depth knowledge" in configuration example.
Source Log Message Typo src/app/endpoints/feedback.py	Fixed typo in log message: "sucessfully" → "successfully".
Test Comment and Docstring Typos tests/e2e/gen_scenario_list.py, tests/integration/test_version.py, tests/unit/test_client.py, tests/unit/utils/test_endpoints.py, tests/unit/utils/test_types.py	Corrected various typos in comments and docstrings without altering any test logic or structure.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A hop, a skip, a typo gone,
The docs and logs now carry on.
With every dash and every dot,
The bunny checks, the errors caught.
Now words are crisp, the meaning clear—
Hooray for fixes, far and near!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

tests/unit/utils/test_types.py (1)

9-9: Duplicate docstring—minor cleanup opportunity

The class-level docstring repeats the module-level one verbatim. Consider trimming or adding class-specific context to avoid redundancy.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e8f785 and 8964513.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)

• README.md (1 hunks)
• src/app/endpoints/feedback.py (1 hunks)
• tests/e2e/gen_scenario_list.py (1 hunks)
• tests/integration/test_version.py (1 hunks)
• tests/unit/test_client.py (2 hunks)
• tests/unit/utils/test_endpoints.py (1 hunks)
• tests/unit/utils/test_types.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)

tests/unit/utils/test_types.py (1)

src/utils/types.py (1)

• GraniteToolParser (23-37)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: e2e_tests

🔇 Additional comments (8)

src/app/endpoints/feedback.py (1)

128-128: Typo fixed in log message – looks good
The corrected spelling improves log clarity.

README.md (1)

208-212: Documentation wording corrected – approved
Switching to “in-depth” reads better; no further action needed.

tests/unit/test_client.py (2)

10-11: Docstring typo resolved – good to merge

---

22-23: Second docstring typo resolved – good to merge

tests/integration/test_version.py (1)

1-1: Docstring spelling fixed – approved

tests/e2e/gen_scenario_list.py (1)

45-46: Comment typo corrected – looks good

tests/unit/utils/test_endpoints.py (1)

56-58: Spelling correction acknowledged

Fixing “systme” → “system” improves docstring clarity. No other concerns.

tests/unit/utils/test_types.py (1)

1-1: Typo fixed in module docstring

“functionns” → “functions” is correct.

[tisnik]

looks ok, thank you!