Skip to content

Conversation

@tisnik
Copy link
Contributor

@tisnik tisnik commented Jul 31, 2025

Description

LCORE-448: Bump-up to version 0.1.2

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up service version
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change
  • Unit tests improvement
  • Integration tests improvement
  • End to end tests improvement

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #LCORE-448

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated version number from 0.1.1 to 0.1.2 in documentation, dependency instructions, and application metadata.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Walkthrough

The version number was incremented from "0.1.1" to "0.1.2" in the OpenAPI specification, Python version file, README badge, and dependency version in documentation. No changes were made to logic, API paths, schemas, or exported entities.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
OpenAPI Spec Version Update
docs/openapi.json
Updated the OpenAPI info.version from "0.1.1" to "0.1.2".
Python Version String Update
src/version.py
Changed __version__ from "0.1.1" to "0.1.2".
Documentation Version Updates
README.md, docs/getting_started.md
Updated version references from "0.1.1" to "0.1.2" in badge and dependency installation instructions.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • Bump version to 0.1.1 #315: Both PRs increment the version string in src/version.py and the API version in docs/openapi.json, making their changes directly related.

Poem

A hop and a skip, the version ascends,
From one-one to one-two, the journey extends.
No code did we touch, just numbers we tweak,
A rabbit’s delight—release day this week!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/openapi.json (2)

10-10: Spec version updated — consider generating this field from src/version.py

The manual duplication of the version string ("0.1.2") invites future mismatch between code and spec. Long-term, pipe the value in at build time (e.g., sed, jinja2, or pydantic-settings) so there’s a single source of truth.


1771-1771: Missing trailing newline (minor)

The file now ends without a newline; some linters flag this. Add one if your tooling enforces POSIX-style newlines.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between accf3a9 and fd3cef9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/openapi.json (2 hunks)
  • src/version.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e_tests

# source = "file"
# path = "src/version.py"
__version__ = "0.1.1"
__version__ = "0.1.2"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Version bump looks good – please confirm no stale “0.1.1” strings remain

👍 __version__ now reads 0.1.2. To avoid subtle drift (e.g., README badges, Helm charts, CI manifests), run a quick search and fix any leftovers.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Find hard-coded occurrences of the old version.
rg --colors=never -n '"0\.1\.1"' || true

Length of output: 143


The rg invocation is using an invalid --colors=never flag. Let’s re-run the search with the correct --color=never option (and fall back to grep if needed):


🏁 Script executed:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Corrected search for hard-coded occurrences of the old version "0.1.1"

echo "Searching with ripgrep..."
rg --color=never -n '0\.1\.1' || true

echo "Fallback search with grep..."
grep -R "0.1.1" -n . || true

Length of output: 65963


Update remaining hard-coded “0.1.1” references to “0.1.2”

We found two leftover occurrences of the prior release tag that need bumping:

• README.md (line 9): update badge link
• docs/getting_started.md (line 666): update example dependency spec

Suggested diffs:

--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 [![Tag](https://img.shields.io/github/v/tag/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack)](https://github.com/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack/releases/tag/0.1.1)

https://github.com/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack/releases/tag/0.1.1


--- a/docs/getting_started.md
+++ b/docs/getting_started.md
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@
To install the local build:

```shell
-~ lightspeed-stack==0.1.1 (from file:///tmp/ramdisk/lightspeed-stack)
+~ lightspeed-stack==0.1.2 (from file:///tmp/ramdisk/lightspeed-stack)

After applying these, rerun `rg -n '0\.1\.1'` to confirm no stale references remain.

<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>

In src/version.py at line 12, the version string is correctly updated to
"0.1.2". Now update the remaining hard-coded "0.1.1" references in README.md at
line 9 by changing the release tag URL to "0.1.2" and in docs/getting_started.md
at line 666 by updating the example dependency specification from
"lightspeed-stack==0.1.1" to "lightspeed-stack==0.1.2". After these changes, run
a search for "0.1.1" to ensure no stale references remain.


</details>

<!-- fingerprinting:phantom:triton:cougar -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->

@tisnik tisnik force-pushed the bump-up-to-version-0.1.2 branch from fd3cef9 to 23461ed Compare July 31, 2025 11:47
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

9-9: Consider using a “latest” release link to avoid future manual bumps
Hard-coding the tag (/releases/tag/0.1.2) means README must be edited for every version bump. Pointing to /releases/latest (or omitting the explicit tag) keeps the badge link evergreen and removes this recurrent maintenance step.

-[![Tag](https://img.shields.io/github/v/tag/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack)](https://github.com/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack/releases/tag/0.1.2)
+[![Tag](https://img.shields.io/github/v/tag/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack)](https://github.com/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack/releases/latest)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd3cef9 and 23461ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/getting_started.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/openapi.json (2 hunks)
  • src/version.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • docs/getting_started.md
  • docs/openapi.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/version.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

9-9: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)

@tisnik tisnik merged commit e698a95 into lightspeed-core:main Jul 31, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2025
15 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 22, 2025
15 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2025
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant