Skip to content

Conversation

@tisnik
Copy link
Contributor

@tisnik tisnik commented Aug 5, 2025

Description

LCORE-459: Bump-up to version 0.1.3

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up service version
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change
  • Unit tests improvement
  • Integration tests improvement
  • End to end tests improvement

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #LCORE-459

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated version number from 0.1.2 to 0.1.3 in the README, API documentation, and OpenAPI specification.
    • Updated installation and usage instructions to reflect version 0.1.3.
  • Chores

    • Bumped the application version to 0.1.3.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Walkthrough

This change updates the version number from "0.1.2" to "0.1.3" across several files, including documentation, the OpenAPI specification, and the source code's version constant. No other content, functionality, or logic was altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation Version Update
README.md, docs/getting_started.md
Updated displayed version numbers from "0.1.2" to "0.1.3" in documentation and example responses.
OpenAPI Spec Version Update
docs/openapi.json
Changed API version in the "info" section from "0.1.2" to "0.1.3"; added final newline.
Source Version Constant
src/version.py
Updated the __version__ constant from "0.1.2" to "0.1.3".

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagram generated, as all changes are simple version string updates with no control flow modifications.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A hop, a skip, a version jump,
From two to three, we thump-thump-thump!
Docs and code in harmony,
Now all aligned at "point one three."
🐇✨ Version bumps are quick and neat—
Release notes done, now take a seat!

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c293dba and 362aee6.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/getting_started.md (3 hunks)
  • docs/openapi.json (2 hunks)
  • src/version.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • README.md
  • docs/getting_started.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/version.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
docs/openapi.json

[HIGH] 1-1795: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined

(CKV_OPENAPI_4)


[HIGH] 1-1795: Ensure that security operations is not empty.

(CKV_OPENAPI_5)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e_tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/openapi.json (1)

10-10: Version bump confirmed

info.version correctly changes to "0.1.3". Nothing else is altered.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/openapi.json (1)

1-1795: Add global security definitions to OpenAPI spec
The spec currently defines 401/403 responses but no top-level security or securitySchemes, which breaks tooling and may be a compliance gap.

  • docs/openapi.json: insert a top-level security array immediately after the "info" block
  • docs/openapi.json: add a securitySchemes object under "components"
@@ "info": { ... },
+  "security": [
+    { "bearerAuth": [] }
+  ],
@@ "components": {
+  "securitySchemes": {
+    "bearerAuth": {
+      "type": "http",
+      "scheme": "bearer",
+      "bearerFormat": "JWT"
+    }
+  },
   "schemas": {
     ...

Please confirm with your security/API owners which auth scheme to use (e.g., API key vs. JWT) and update accordingly.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/getting_started.md (1)

1746-1749: Manual version strings are error-prone – consider templating

Hard-coding 0.1.3 here means the file must be edited for every future patch. Long-term, inject the value during the docs build (e.g., {{ __version__ }} via Jinja or mkdocs-macros).

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12dcea3 and c293dba.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/getting_started.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/openapi.json (2 hunks)
  • src/version.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
docs/openapi.json

[HIGH] 1-1795: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined

(CKV_OPENAPI_4)


[HIGH] 1-1795: Ensure that security operations is not empty.

(CKV_OPENAPI_5)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/version.py (1)

12-12: Version constant correctly bumped, but make sure packaging metadata is rebuilt

The change is spot-on. After merging, remember to re-generate distribution artifacts (e.g., make distribution-archives) so that PyPI/containers pick up 0.1.3, and cut the corresponding Git tag/release.

docs/openapi.json (1)

10-10: Version string bumped successfully

info.version is updated to 0.1.3, matching the declared PR intent.

[![made-with-python](https://img.shields.io/badge/Made%20with-Python-1f425f.svg)](https://www.python.org/)
[![Required Python version](https://img.shields.io/python/required-version-toml?tomlFilePath=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githubusercontent.com%2Flightspeed-core%2Flightspeed-stack%2Frefs%2Fheads%2Fmain%2Fpyproject.toml)](https://www.python.org/)
[![Tag](https://img.shields.io/github/v/tag/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack)](https://github.com/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack/releases/tag/0.1.2)
[![Tag](https://img.shields.io/github/v/tag/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack)](https://github.com/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack/releases/tag/0.1.3)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Link now targets 0.1.3 — verify no other stale badges

The badge points to the new tag and looks fine. To be safe, scan the repo for any remaining 0.1.2 literals.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find any forgotten hard-coded references to the old version.
rg -n '"?0\.1\.2"?' || true

Length of output: 1678


Replace leftover 0.1.2 references in docs/getting_started.md

Scan results uncovered hard-coded mentions of the old version in your getting-started guide. Please update these to 0.1.3:

  • docs/getting_started.md: line 690
    ~ lightspeed-stack==0.1.2
  • docs/getting_started.md: line 1025
    To retrieve stable version 0.1.2, use the following command:
  • docs/getting_started.md: line 1028
    podman pull quay.io/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack:0.1.2
  • docs/getting_started.md: line 1032
    Trying to pull quay.io/lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack:0.1.2...

The uv.lock entries pinning dependencies at “0.1.2” are autogenerated—no manual edits needed (you can regenerate the lock file if you want those updated).

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/getting_started.md at lines 690, 1025, 1028, and 1032, update all
hard-coded references of version "0.1.2" to "0.1.3" to ensure the documentation
reflects the current stable version. No changes are needed for uv.lock as it is
autogenerated.

@tisnik tisnik force-pushed the lcore-459-bump-up-to-version-0.1.3 branch from c293dba to 362aee6 Compare August 5, 2025 06:34
@tisnik tisnik merged commit 22a7893 into lightspeed-core:main Aug 5, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 22, 2025
15 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2025
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant