Skip to content

Conversation

@tisnik
Copy link
Contributor

@tisnik tisnik commented Oct 9, 2025

Description

(nit) Missing assert in integration tests

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up service version
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change
  • Unit tests improvement
  • Integration tests improvement
  • End to end tests improvement

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Strengthened configuration tests by asserting the presence of an API key in the LLAMA stack configuration, while continuing to validate correct secret retrieval. This improves test coverage and confidence in configuration integrity, enhancing CI signal and helping prevent silent misconfigurations. No changes to user-facing behavior or functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds an extra assertion in tests/integration/test_configuration.py to check that ls_config.api_key is not None before verifying its secret value in the existing test_loading_proper_configuration test.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Integration tests
tests/integration/test_configuration.py
Added assertion ensuring ls_config.api_key is not None prior to calling get_secret_value(); no other logic changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A whisk of keys, a secret to see,
I twitch my nose—assertions agree.
None shall pass without a sign,
Then “xyzzy” whispers, all inline.
Thump-thump—tests hop green with glee! 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title clearly conveys that the pull request adds a previously missing assertion in the integration tests and directly aligns with the changeset’s primary purpose, making it concise and specific enough for easy historical scanning.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 622b11d and 3cda676.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/integration/test_configuration.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

**/*.py: All modules start with descriptive module-level docstrings explaining purpose
Use logger = logging.getLogger(name) for module logging after import logging
Define type aliases at module level for clarity
All functions require docstrings with brief descriptions
Provide complete type annotations for all function parameters and return types
Use typing_extensions.Self in model validators where appropriate
Use modern union syntax (str | int) and Optional[T] or T | None consistently
Function names use snake_case with descriptive, action-oriented prefixes (get_, validate_, check_)
Avoid in-place parameter modification; return new data structures instead of mutating arguments
Use appropriate logging levels: debug, info, warning, error with clear messages
All classes require descriptive docstrings explaining purpose
Class names use PascalCase with conventional suffixes (Configuration, Error/Exception, Resolver, Interface)
Abstract base classes should use abc.ABC and @AbstractMethod for interfaces
Provide complete type annotations for all class attributes
Follow Google Python docstring style for modules, classes, and functions, including Args, Returns, Raises, Attributes sections as needed

Files:

  • tests/integration/test_configuration.py
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests
Do not use unittest in tests; pytest is the standard

Files:

  • tests/integration/test_configuration.py
tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

tests/**/*.py: Use pytest-mock to create AsyncMock objects for async interactions in tests
Use the shared auth mock constant: MOCK_AUTH = ("mock_user_id", "mock_username", False, "mock_token") in tests

Files:

  • tests/integration/test_configuration.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build-pr
  • GitHub Check: e2e_tests (ci)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/integration/test_configuration.py (1)

61-61: LGTM! Good defensive assertion.

The new assertion follows the established pattern in this test of checking for None before accessing attributes. It makes test failures more explicit if api_key is missing, preventing an AttributeError on line 62.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@tisnik tisnik merged commit 778123e into lightspeed-core:main Oct 9, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant