Add support for decoding WebP images#747
Conversation
|
Looks good to me. All we have to do now is to ask them nicely to stop using |
|
Looks like we need a MSRV bump as well. |
|
Ok, waiting for 0.1.3 and I'm ready to merge. |
|
any updates on this? would be great to have webp support ❤️ |
|
Still waiting for the new release I think. |
|
0.1.3 was just released, so I'll rebase & clean up the PR soon....ish. I've got some family in town so it might be a couple of days. |
|
Sure, no problem. |
|
Okie doke, tests are green locally, so this should now be ready to review. |
How much of a dealbreaker is this? And/or as |
|
We can bump MSRV no problem. It's set in:
|
|
@RazrFalcon bumped MSRV, can you approve workflow? tyty. Also, do you want me to bump |
|
All good, thanks. |
Hiya 👋
I was hoping to use WebP in a project, and noticed (via #575) that the
image-webpproject has been published now. This PR adds support for the project withinresvg.As noted in #575 there may be performance issues - I haven't tested extensively. However in my use case, it saves a step of converting
.webpimages to a compatible format, so even a slow(ish) implementation is an overall positive. With that in mind, it feels like a step forward forresvgto support WebP, even if there's still room in future for their (pre-1.0) project to improve.