Skip to content

Conversation

@amc-corey-cox
Copy link
Contributor

We should refactor the large map_object function but I think we should do it incrementally as needed. This is my suggestion on how we should do that. I've also added instructions to Claude that should encourage it to extract parts as the code is changed.

@amc-corey-cox amc-corey-cox linked an issue Dec 18, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@amc-corey-cox amc-corey-cox merged commit 1d6cd86 into main Jan 8, 2026
13 checks passed
@amc-corey-cox amc-corey-cox deleted the mark_refactor_104 branch January 8, 2026 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incremental refactoring of complex functions via extract-on-touch markers

2 participants