Skip to content

Update Packit configuration #305

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
rb-union merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2025
Merged

Update Packit configuration #305

rb-union merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2025

Conversation

@packit-public-repos-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@packit-public-repos-bot packit-public-repos-bot commented Dec 11, 2024

In case of any questions, please contact Packit team.

@packit-public-repos-bot
Fix configuration for Packit 1.0.0
1bc9ef7 
This commit fixes the configuration for the forthcoming Packit 1.0.0.
See [our blog post](https://packit.dev/posts/packit_1_0_0_action_required) for more details.
  - Job type `build` has been changed to `copr_build`.
  - Job type `production_build` has been changed to `upstream_koji_build`.
  - Key `upstream_project_name` has been changed to `upstream_package_name`.
  - Key `synced_files` has been changed to `files_to_sync`.

Please review and merge me before January 2025 otherwise packit-service jobs will fail because of an invalid configuration.
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin-ci-robot commented Dec 11, 2024

Hi @packit-public-repos-bot. Thanks for your PR. 😃

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin-ci-robot commented Dec 11, 2024

Hi @packit-public-repos-bot. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a linuxdeepin member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

CLA Assistant Lite bot:

如果你是以企业贡献者的身份进行提交，请联系我们签署企业贡献者许可协议
If you submit as corporate contributor, please contact us to sign our Corporate Contributor License Agreement

感谢您的提交，我们非常感谢。 像许多开源项目一样，在接受您的贡献之前，我们要求您签署我们的个人贡献者许可协议。 您只需发布与以下格式相同的评论即可签署个人贡献者许可协议。
Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Individual Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the Individual Contributor License Agreement by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA.

You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Dec 14, 2024

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.7
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #306

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Dec 20, 2024

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.8
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #307

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Dec 26, 2024

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.9
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #314

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Jan 2, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.10
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #316

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Jan 9, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.11
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #318

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Jan 16, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.12
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #322

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Jan 20, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.13
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #324

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Feb 14, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.14
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #326

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Feb 20, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.15
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #329

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Feb 27, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.16
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #330

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.17
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #334

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Mar 20, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.18
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #335

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Mar 28, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.19
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #339

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Mar 28, 2025

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.5.20
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #341

@rb-union rb-union merged commit bfa8bed into linuxdeepin:master Mar 31, 2025
16 of 18 checks passed
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin-ci-robot commented Mar 31, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: packit-public-repos-bot, rb-union

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rb-union rb-union rb-union approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

needs-ok-to-test

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@packit-public-repos-bot @deepin-ci-robot @rb-union