Should this be an RFC?
Which package is this a feature request for?
SSR (@lit-labs/ssr)
Description
Currently we include both the old shadowroot attribute and the new shadowrootmode attribute on <template> elements of the generated DSD.
Chromium was the only one that was supporting the shadowroot attribute. It began shipping streaming DSD with the new shadowrootmode attribute in Chromium 111 along with Webkit early this year.
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5161240576393216
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249513
The non-standard shadowroot attribute has been marked deprecated since Chromium 112, to be removed in Chromium 119. https://chromestatus.com/feature/6239658726391808
The template shadowroot ponyfill was already updated to look for shadowrootmode instead of shadowroot here webcomponents/template-shadowroot#43
Alternatives and Workarounds
n/a
Should this be an RFC?
Which package is this a feature request for?
SSR (@lit-labs/ssr)
Description
Currently we include both the old
shadowrootattribute and the newshadowrootmodeattribute on<template>elements of the generated DSD.Chromium was the only one that was supporting the
shadowrootattribute. It began shipping streaming DSD with the newshadowrootmodeattribute in Chromium 111 along with Webkit early this year.https://chromestatus.com/feature/5161240576393216
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249513
The non-standard
shadowrootattribute has been marked deprecated since Chromium 112, to be removed in Chromium 119. https://chromestatus.com/feature/6239658726391808The template shadowroot ponyfill was already updated to look for
shadowrootmodeinstead ofshadowroothere webcomponents/template-shadowroot#43Alternatives and Workarounds
n/a