Skip to content

feat(api): introduce TransactionSeries and update ShippingMethod fields#73

Merged
stainless-app[bot] merged 1 commit intogeneratedfrom
feat-api-introduce-transaction-s
Apr 8, 2025
Merged

feat(api): introduce TransactionSeries and update ShippingMethod fields#73
stainless-app[bot] merged 1 commit intogeneratedfrom
feat-api-introduce-transaction-s

Conversation

@stainless-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stainless-app stainless-app Bot commented Apr 8, 2025

  • Add new transaction_series schema and fields for Transaction events
  • Add expected_release_date property to Payments
  • Deprecate various business entity fields and improve documentation
  • Add new LOSS_WRITE_OFF transaction type

  - Add new `transaction_series` schema and fields for Transaction events
  - Add `expected_release_date` property to Payments
  - Deprecate various business entity fields and improve documentation
  - Add new `LOSS_WRITE_OFF` transaction type
@stainless-app stainless-app Bot merged commit 38141b9 into generated Apr 8, 2025
@stainless-app stainless-app Bot deleted the feat-api-introduce-transaction-s branch April 8, 2025 13:23
stainless-app Bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
…ds (#73)

  - Add new `transaction_series` schema and fields for Transaction events
  - Add `expected_release_date` property to Payments
  - Deprecate various business entity fields and improve documentation
  - Add new `LOSS_WRITE_OFF` transaction type
@stainless-app stainless-app Bot mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2025
stainless-app Bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
…ds (#73)

  - Add new `transaction_series` schema and fields for Transaction events
  - Add `expected_release_date` property to Payments
  - Deprecate various business entity fields and improve documentation
  - Add new `LOSS_WRITE_OFF` transaction type
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants