Skip to content

docs: cross-reference fleet rollout from staging/integration docs#538

Merged
Nathan Schram (nathanschram) merged 1 commit into
devfrom
docs/fleet-rollout-doc-pointers
May 15, 2026
Merged

docs: cross-reference fleet rollout from staging/integration docs#538
Nathan Schram (nathanschram) merged 1 commit into
devfrom
docs/fleet-rollout-doc-pointers

Conversation

@nathanschram
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

PR #537 landed scripts/fleet-rollout.sh + companions, and updated CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules/release-discipline.md, and .claude/skills/release-coordination/SKILL.md to cover the new 4-host parallel workflow. Three surfaces still pointed at the lba-1-only model. This patch adds one-pointer cross-references on each:

  • docs/reference/dev-instance.md — note lba-1 staging is one of 4 hosts
  • docs/reference/integration-testing.md — replace step 14 ("commit, tag, release") with the attestation marker + fleet-rollout sequence
  • .claude/rules/dev-workflow.md — add a "Multi-host fleet rollout" section pointing to the scripts and release-discipline.md

No duplication of canonical fleet-rollout content. No behaviour changes. Total: +18 lines.

Test plan

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

PR #537 landed the multi-host fleet rollout scripts and updated CLAUDE.md
+ release-discipline.md + release-coordination skill to cover the new
4-host parallel workflow. This patch fills the cross-references the
remaining surfaces were missing:

- docs/reference/dev-instance.md — note lba-1 staging is one of 4 hosts
- docs/reference/integration-testing.md — replace step 14 ("commit, tag,
  release") with the attestation-marker + fleet-rollout sequence
- .claude/rules/dev-workflow.md — add a "Multi-host fleet rollout"
  section pointing to the scripts and release-discipline.md

Pure cross-references; no behaviour changes, no duplication of the
canonical fleet-rollout content (which lives in release-discipline.md).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 15, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 63452c17-e479-4df0-83a1-ea28c498a906

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/fleet-rollout-doc-pointers

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@nathanschram Nathan Schram (nathanschram) enabled auto-merge (squash) May 15, 2026 03:01
@nathanschram Nathan Schram (nathanschram) merged commit 9b8a33c into dev May 15, 2026
20 of 21 checks passed
@nathanschram Nathan Schram (nathanschram) deleted the docs/fleet-rollout-doc-pointers branch May 15, 2026 03:03
Nathan Schram (nathanschram) added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2026
Bumps pyproject.toml from 0.35.3rc14 → 0.35.3rc15 so CI publishes the
post-rc14 dev-branch changes to TestPyPI:

- #539 deps: bump urllib3 2.6.3 → 2.7.0 to clear pip-audit CVEs
- #538 docs: cross-reference fleet rollout from staging/integration docs
- #541 fix: #497 debounce catalog.refresh_sent to prevent storms
- #542 docs(changelog): complete v0.35.3 entries (#404 #498 #501 #502 #522 #530)

Pre-release (rc) — no CHANGELOG entry required; validate_release.py skips
pre-release versions. Stable v0.35.3 changelog already covers the included
fixes via PR #542.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant