Fix thermostat circuit test parameter assertions

[liudger]

This pull request makes a targeted improvement to the test coverage for the thermostat circuit functionality. Specifically, it enhances the assertion in test_thermostat_circuit2_no_temp_range to verify that the _request method is called with the correct parameters, ensuring more precise validation of the code's behavior.

Test coverage improvements:

• tests/test_circuit.py: Updated the assertion in test_thermostat_circuit2_no_temp_range to check that mock_bsblan_circuit._request is called with the expected arguments (base_path="/JS" and the correct data payload), rather than just being awaited.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.89%. Comparing base (c79da53) to head (2217d69).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1438   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.89%   99.89%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         955      955           
  Branches      128      128           
=======================================
  Hits          954      954           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR tightens test validation around the thermostat circuit (HC2) behavior by asserting the exact _request() call arguments, making the test verify the correct API payload rather than only that a call occurred.

Changes:

• Updated test_thermostat_circuit2_no_temp_range to assert _request is awaited with base_path="/JS" and the expected {Parameter, Value, Type} payload.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud