After feedback is reviewed, the backlog will be updated with notes on what changed, what was accepted, and where community or Review Team feedback affected prioritization. Items may be re-ranked, clarified, merged, removed, or split depending on the feedback received.
The final backlog will remain tied to the teardown evidence, scenario analysis, gap specification, and design brief. It will also clearly identify which items are best suited for near-term retro grants and which should become larger follow-on RFPs or dedicated implementation scopes.
The goal is for the final backlog to be specific enough that at least three items can be converted into follow-on work within the RFP’s impact window.
Deliverables
Acceptance Criteria
After feedback is reviewed, the backlog will be updated with notes on what changed, what was accepted, and where community or Review Team feedback affected prioritization. Items may be re-ranked, clarified, merged, removed, or split depending on the feedback received.
The final backlog will remain tied to the teardown evidence, scenario analysis, gap specification, and design brief. It will also clearly identify which items are best suited for near-term retro grants and which should become larger follow-on RFPs or dedicated implementation scopes.
The goal is for the final backlog to be specific enough that at least three items can be converted into follow-on work within the RFP’s impact window.
Deliverables
Acceptance Criteria