Test split_duration_records_vectorized thorougly#24
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request updates the
split_duration_records_vectorizedfunction to consistently use the standardint64dtype for theCOL_TIME_RANGEcolumn, and introduces a comprehensive new test suite to verify the function’s correctness across a variety of scenarios, including edge cases and Dask dataframe integration.Data type consistency:
COL_TIME_RANGEcolumn from'uint64[pyarrow]'to standard'int64'in both the shortcut and main vectorization paths withinsplit_duration_records_vectorizedindfanalyzer/analysis_utils.py. This ensures compatibility and avoids potential issues with pyarrow extension types. [1] [2]Testing improvements:
tests/test_analysis_utils.pythat provides extensive coverage forsplit_duration_records_vectorized, including: