-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.1k
[compiler-rt][asan][test] Make wchar tests more robust #163715
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The stack buffer which is used to trigger out of bounds issue doesn't have obervable side effects, so it can easily be optimized by compiler as dead code. Signed-off-by: Maosu Zhao <maosu.zhao@intel.com>
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer Author: Maosu Zhao (zhaomaosu) ChangesThe stack buffer which is used to trigger out of bounds issue doesn't have obervable side effects, so it can easily be optimized by compiler as dead code. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163715.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcscat.cpp b/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcscat.cpp
index fd0b5a4310351..beab1dc52e437 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcscat.cpp
+++ b/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcscat.cpp
@@ -9,11 +9,13 @@
int main() {
const wchar_t *start = L"X means ";
const wchar_t *append = L"dog";
- wchar_t goodDst[12];
+ wchar_t goodArray[12];
+ wchar_t *volatile goodDst = goodArray;
wcscpy(goodDst, start);
wcscat(goodDst, append);
- wchar_t badDst[9];
+ wchar_t badArray[9];
+ wchar_t *volatile badDst = badArray;
wcscpy(badDst, start);
fprintf(stderr, "Good so far.\n");
// CHECK-DAG: Good so far.
diff --git a/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcscpy.cpp b/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcscpy.cpp
index 8133a588cb071..2b828035cb498 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcscpy.cpp
+++ b/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcscpy.cpp
@@ -8,10 +8,12 @@
int main() {
const wchar_t *src = L"X means dog";
- wchar_t goodDst[12];
+ wchar_t goodArray[12];
+ wchar_t *volatile goodDst = goodArray;
wcscpy(goodDst, src);
- wchar_t badDst[7];
+ wchar_t badArray[7];
+ wchar_t *volatile badDst = badArray;
fprintf(stderr, "Good so far.\n");
// CHECK-DAG: Good so far.
fflush(stderr);
diff --git a/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcsncat.cpp b/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcsncat.cpp
index 365e732e2d051..04cdcf290ffed 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcsncat.cpp
+++ b/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcsncat.cpp
@@ -9,11 +9,13 @@
int main() {
const wchar_t *start = L"X means ";
const wchar_t *append = L"dog";
- wchar_t goodDst[15];
+ wchar_t goodArray[15];
+ wchar_t *volatile goodDst = goodArray;
wcscpy(goodDst, start);
wcsncat(goodDst, append, 5);
- wchar_t badDst[11];
+ wchar_t badArray[11];
+ wchar_t *volatile badDst = badArray;
wcscpy(badDst, start);
wcsncat(badDst, append, 1);
fprintf(stderr, "Good so far.\n");
diff --git a/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcsncpy.cpp b/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcsncpy.cpp
index 485ddc4804dcd..9e11b55fe4ec9 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcsncpy.cpp
+++ b/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/wcsncpy.cpp
@@ -8,10 +8,12 @@
int main() {
const wchar_t *src = L"X means dog";
- wchar_t goodDst[12];
+ wchar_t goodArray[12];
+ wchar_t *volatile goodDst = goodArray;
wcsncpy(goodDst, src, 12);
- wchar_t badDst[7];
+ wchar_t badArray[7];
+ wchar_t *volatile badDst = badArray;
wcsncpy(badDst, src, 7); // This should still work.
fprintf(stderr, "Good so far.\n");
// CHECK-DAG: Good so far.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
|
@zhaomaosu Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR. Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues. How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
The stack buffer which is used to trigger out of bounds issue doesn't have obervable side effects, so it can easily be optimized by compiler as dead code.