-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.1k
[AMDGPU] Add target feature for waits before system scope stores. NFC. #164993
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu Author: Jay Foad (jayfoad) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164993.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.td b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.td
index 1c8383c3a682d..f78a2c0029dc9 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.td
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.td
@@ -1466,6 +1466,12 @@ def FeatureClusters : SubtargetFeature< "clusters",
"Has clusters of workgroups support"
>;
+def FeatureWaitsBeforeSystemScopeStores
+ : SubtargetFeature<"waits-before-system-scope-stores",
+ "RequiresWaitsBeforeSystemScopeStores", "true",
+ "Target requires waits for loads and atomics before "
+ "system scope stores">;
+
// Dummy feature used to disable assembler instructions.
def FeatureDisable : SubtargetFeature<"",
"FeatureDisable","true",
@@ -2060,7 +2066,8 @@ def FeatureISAVersion12 : FeatureSet<
FeatureMaxHardClauseLength32,
Feature1_5xVGPRs,
FeatureMemoryAtomicFAddF32DenormalSupport,
- FeatureBVHDualAndBVH8Insts
+ FeatureBVHDualAndBVH8Insts,
+ FeatureWaitsBeforeSystemScopeStores,
]>;
def FeatureISAVersion12_50 : FeatureSet<
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/GCNSubtarget.h b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/GCNSubtarget.h
index ac660d5fada79..f377b8aaf1333 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/GCNSubtarget.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/GCNSubtarget.h
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ class GCNSubtarget final : public AMDGPUGenSubtargetInfo,
bool Has45BitNumRecordsBufferResource = false;
bool HasClusters = false;
+ bool RequiresWaitsBeforeSystemScopeStores = false;
// Dummy feature to use for assembler in tablegen.
bool FeatureDisable = false;
@@ -1861,6 +1862,10 @@ class GCNSubtarget final : public AMDGPUGenSubtargetInfo,
bool has45BitNumRecordsBufferResource() const {
return Has45BitNumRecordsBufferResource;
}
+
+ bool requiresWaitsBeforeSystemScopeStores() const {
+ return RequiresWaitsBeforeSystemScopeStores;
+ }
};
class GCNUserSGPRUsageInfo {
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIMemoryLegalizer.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIMemoryLegalizer.cpp
index 07264d973648f..d9f51d7b6592a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIMemoryLegalizer.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIMemoryLegalizer.cpp
@@ -2673,7 +2673,8 @@ bool SIGfx12CacheControl::finalizeStore(MachineInstr &MI, bool Atomic) const {
const unsigned Scope = CPol->getImm() & CPol::SCOPE;
// GFX12.0 only: Extra waits needed before system scope stores.
- if (!ST.hasGFX1250Insts() && !Atomic && Scope == CPol::SCOPE_SYS)
+ if (ST.requiresWaitsBeforeSystemScopeStores() && !Atomic &&
+ Scope == CPol::SCOPE_SYS)
Changed |= insertWaitsBeforeSystemScopeStore(MI.getIterator());
return Changed;
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wait-before-stores-with-scope_sys.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wait-before-stores-with-scope_sys.ll
index 2d7a91f0cd114..985bcbd6ff4f4 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wait-before-stores-with-scope_sys.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wait-before-stores-with-scope_sys.ll
@@ -1,22 +1,50 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4
-; RUN: llc -global-isel=0 -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1200 < %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=GFX12 %s
-; RUN: llc -global-isel=1 -new-reg-bank-select -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1200 < %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=GFX12 %s
+; RUN: llc -global-isel=0 -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1200 < %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=GFX1200 %s
+; RUN: llc -global-isel=1 -new-reg-bank-select -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1200 < %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=GFX1200 %s
+; RUN: llc -global-isel=0 -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1250 < %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=GFX1250-SDAG %s
+; RUN: llc -global-isel=1 -new-reg-bank-select -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1250 < %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=GFX1250-GISEL %s
define amdgpu_ps void @intrinsic_store_system_scope(i32 %val, <4 x i32> inreg %rsrc, i32 %vindex, i32 %voffset, i32 inreg %soffset) {
-; GFX12-LABEL: intrinsic_store_system_scope:
-; GFX12: ; %bb.0:
-; GFX12-NEXT: buffer_store_b32 v0, v[1:2], s[0:3], s4 idxen offen scope:SCOPE_SYS
-; GFX12-NEXT: s_endpgm
+; GFX1200-LABEL: intrinsic_store_system_scope:
+; GFX1200: ; %bb.0:
+; GFX1200-NEXT: buffer_store_b32 v0, v[1:2], s[0:3], s4 idxen offen scope:SCOPE_SYS
+; GFX1200-NEXT: s_endpgm
+;
+; GFX1250-SDAG-LABEL: intrinsic_store_system_scope:
+; GFX1250-SDAG: ; %bb.0:
+; GFX1250-SDAG-NEXT: v_dual_mov_b32 v3, v2 :: v_dual_mov_b32 v2, v1
+; GFX1250-SDAG-NEXT: buffer_store_b32 v0, v[2:3], s[0:3], s4 idxen offen scope:SCOPE_SYS
+; GFX1250-SDAG-NEXT: s_endpgm
+;
+; GFX1250-GISEL-LABEL: intrinsic_store_system_scope:
+; GFX1250-GISEL: ; %bb.0:
+; GFX1250-GISEL-NEXT: v_dual_mov_b32 v4, v1 :: v_dual_mov_b32 v5, v2
+; GFX1250-GISEL-NEXT: buffer_store_b32 v0, v[4:5], s[0:3], s4 idxen offen scope:SCOPE_SYS
+; GFX1250-GISEL-NEXT: s_endpgm
call void @llvm.amdgcn.struct.buffer.store.i32(i32 %val, <4 x i32> %rsrc, i32 %vindex, i32 %voffset, i32 %soffset, i32 24)
ret void
}
define amdgpu_ps void @generic_store_volatile(i32 %val, ptr addrspace(1) %out) {
-; GFX12-LABEL: generic_store_volatile:
-; GFX12: ; %bb.0:
-; GFX12-NEXT: global_store_b32 v[1:2], v0, off scope:SCOPE_SYS
-; GFX12-NEXT: s_wait_storecnt 0x0
-; GFX12-NEXT: s_endpgm
+; GFX1200-LABEL: generic_store_volatile:
+; GFX1200: ; %bb.0:
+; GFX1200-NEXT: global_store_b32 v[1:2], v0, off scope:SCOPE_SYS
+; GFX1200-NEXT: s_wait_storecnt 0x0
+; GFX1200-NEXT: s_endpgm
+;
+; GFX1250-SDAG-LABEL: generic_store_volatile:
+; GFX1250-SDAG: ; %bb.0:
+; GFX1250-SDAG-NEXT: v_dual_mov_b32 v3, v2 :: v_dual_mov_b32 v2, v1
+; GFX1250-SDAG-NEXT: global_store_b32 v[2:3], v0, off scope:SCOPE_SYS
+; GFX1250-SDAG-NEXT: s_wait_storecnt 0x0
+; GFX1250-SDAG-NEXT: s_endpgm
+;
+; GFX1250-GISEL-LABEL: generic_store_volatile:
+; GFX1250-GISEL: ; %bb.0:
+; GFX1250-GISEL-NEXT: v_dual_mov_b32 v4, v1 :: v_dual_mov_b32 v5, v2
+; GFX1250-GISEL-NEXT: global_store_b32 v[4:5], v0, off scope:SCOPE_SYS
+; GFX1250-GISEL-NEXT: s_wait_storecnt 0x0
+; GFX1250-GISEL-NEXT: s_endpgm
store volatile i32 %val, ptr addrspace(1) %out
ret void
}
|
| @@ -1,22 +1,50 @@ | |||
| ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@petar-avramovic this test added in #82996 is strange because it never actually showed any waits being inserted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Think waits are optimized out in final output of ll test, proper test where waits are inserted is mir version of the same test llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/wait-before-stores-with-scope_sys.mir
Iirc test shows how to generate scope:SCOPE_SYS, options are volatile store or intinsic with argument that corresponds to the bitmask for scope
llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.td
Outdated
| >; | ||
|
|
||
| def FeatureWaitsBeforeSystemScopeStores | ||
| : SubtargetFeature<"waits-before-system-scope-stores", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: would be easier to read if one line per argument.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was clang-format's doing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
honestly, I don't think clang-format works well with tablegen files. Most of the time I feel it is very ugly after formatting. Lol.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough. I reformatted it manually more in the style of the other SubtargetFeatures.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need to turn off clang-format for tablegen. I don't think I've ever seen it make a good suggestion
No description provided.