-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
[clang][Sema] Handle target_clones redeclarations that omit the attribute #169259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…bute
This patch adds a case to `CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl()` that detects
redeclarations of `target_clones` functions which omit the attribute, and makes
sure they are marked as redeclarations. It also updates the comment at the call
site of `CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl()` to reflect this.
Previously, `target_clones` multiversioned functions that omitted the attribute
from subsequent declarations would cause Clang to hit an `llvm_unreachable` and
crash. In the following example, the second declaration (the function
definition) should inherit the `target_clones` attribute from the first
declaration (the forward declaration):
```
__attribute__((target_clones("arch=atom", "default")))
void foo(void);
void foo(void) { /* ... */ }
```
However, `CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl()` was not recognizing the function
definition as a redeclaration of the forward declaration, which prevented
`Sema::MergeFunctionDecl()` from automatically inheriting the attribute.
A side effect of this fix is that Clang now catches redeclarations of
`target_clones` functions that have conflicting types, which previously caused
Clang to crash by hitting that same `llvm_unreachable`. The `bad_overload1` case
in `clang/test/Sema/attr-target-clones.c` has been updated to reflect this.
Fixes llvm#165517
Fixes llvm#129483
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Henry Baba-Weiss (henrybw) ChangesThis patch adds a case to Previously, However, A side effect of this fix is that Clang now catches redeclarations of Fixes #165517 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169259.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
index b8ca2a376fde8..651437a6f4c30 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -11996,6 +11996,16 @@ static bool CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl(
}
}
+ // Redeclarations of a target_clones function may omit the attribute, in which
+ // case it will be inherited during declaration merging.
+ if (NewMVKind == MultiVersionKind::None &&
+ OldMVKind == MultiVersionKind::TargetClones) {
+ NewFD->setIsMultiVersion();
+ Redeclaration = true;
+ OldDecl = OldFD;
+ return false;
+ }
+
// Else, this is simply a non-redecl case. Checking the 'value' is only
// necessary in the Target case, since The CPUSpecific/Dispatch cases are
// handled in the attribute adding step.
@@ -12119,8 +12129,9 @@ static bool CheckMultiVersionFunction(Sema &S, FunctionDecl *NewFD,
}
// At this point, we have a multiversion function decl (in OldFD) AND an
- // appropriate attribute in the current function decl. Resolve that these are
- // still compatible with previous declarations.
+ // appropriate attribute in the current function decl (unless it's allowed to
+ // omit the attribute). Resolve that these are still compatible with previous
+ // declarations.
return CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl(S, OldFD, NewFD, NewCPUDisp,
NewCPUSpec, NewClones, Redeclaration,
OldDecl, Previous);
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/attr-target-clones.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/attr-target-clones.c
index 295b25d6478eb..56db77c2b09a3 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/attr-target-clones.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/attr-target-clones.c
@@ -125,6 +125,35 @@ void __attribute__((target_clones("default, arch=ivybridge"))) unused(void) {}
// WINDOWS: musttail call void @unused.arch_ivybridge.0
// WINDOWS: musttail call void @unused.default.1
+int __attribute__((target_clones("sse4.2, default"))) inherited(void);
+int inherited(void) { return 0; }
+// LINUX: define {{.*}}i32 @inherited.sse4.2.0()
+// LINUX: define {{.*}}i32 @inherited.default.1()
+// LINUX: define weak_odr ptr @inherited.resolver() #[[ATTR_RESOLVER]] comdat
+// LINUX: ret ptr @inherited.sse4.2.0
+// LINUX: ret ptr @inherited.default.1
+
+// DARWIN: define {{.*}}i32 @inherited.sse4.2.0()
+// DARWIN: define {{.*}}i32 @inherited.default.1()
+// DARWIN: define weak_odr ptr @inherited.resolver() #[[ATTR_RESOLVER]] {
+// DARWIN: ret ptr @inherited.sse4.2.0
+// DARWIN: ret ptr @inherited.default.1
+
+// WINDOWS: define dso_local i32 @inherited.sse4.2.0()
+// WINDOWS: define dso_local i32 @inherited.default.1()
+// WINDOWS: define weak_odr dso_local i32 @inherited() #[[ATTR_RESOLVER]] comdat
+// WINDOWS: musttail call i32 @inherited.sse4.2.0
+// WINDOWS: musttail call i32 @inherited.default.1
+
+int test_inherited(void) {
+ // LINUX: define {{.*}}i32 @test_inherited() #[[DEF:[0-9]+]]
+ // DARWIN: define {{.*}}i32 @test_inherited() #[[DEF:[0-9]+]]
+ // WINDOWS: define dso_local i32 @test_inherited() #[[DEF:[0-9]+]]
+ return inherited();
+ // LINUX: call i32 @inherited()
+ // DARWIN: call i32 @inherited()
+ // WINDOWS: call i32 @inherited()
+}
inline int __attribute__((target_clones("arch=sandybridge,default,sse4.2")))
foo_inline(void) { return 0; }
diff --git a/clang/test/Sema/attr-target-clones.c b/clang/test/Sema/attr-target-clones.c
index 4597ea54d02bf..40688772eeb96 100644
--- a/clang/test/Sema/attr-target-clones.c
+++ b/clang/test/Sema/attr-target-clones.c
@@ -28,6 +28,17 @@ int __attribute__((target_clones("sse4.2", "arch=atom", "default"))) redecl4(voi
int __attribute__((target_clones("sse4.2", "arch=sandybridge", "default")))
redecl4(void) { return 1; }
+int __attribute__((target_clones("sse4.2", "default"))) redecl5(void);
+int redecl5(void) { return 1; }
+
+int redecl6(void);
+int __attribute__((target_clones("sse4.2", "default"))) redecl6(void) { return 1; }
+
+int __attribute__((target_clones("sse4.2", "default"))) redecl7(void);
+// expected-error@+2 {{multiversioning attributes cannot be combined}}
+// expected-note@-2 {{previous declaration is here}}
+int __attribute__((target("sse4.2"))) redecl7(void) { return 1; }
+
int __attribute__((target("sse4.2"))) redef2(void) { return 1; }
// expected-error@+2 {{multiversioning attributes cannot be combined}}
// expected-note@-2 {{previous declaration is here}}
@@ -87,6 +98,8 @@ int useage(void) {
int __attribute__((target_clones("sse4.2", "default"))) mv_after_use(void) { return 1; }
void bad_overload1(void) __attribute__((target_clones("mmx", "sse4.2", "default")));
+// expected-error@+2 {{conflicting types for 'bad_overload1'}}
+// expected-note@-2 {{previous declaration is here}}
void bad_overload1(int p) {}
void bad_overload2(int p) {}
|
|
Thank you for your patch! Please add a release note entry to "clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst" so that users can know the improvement. |
erichkeane
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is right. I'm happy to let this go and see what happens.
@erichkeane Thanks for the review! I don't have commit access, so could you merge this on my behalf? |
|
@henrybw Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR. Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues. How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
…bute (llvm#169259) This patch adds a case to `CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl()` that detects redeclarations of `target_clones` functions which omit the attribute, and makes sure they are marked as redeclarations. It also updates the comment at the call site of `CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl()` to reflect this. Previously, `target_clones` multiversioned functions that omitted the attribute from subsequent declarations would cause Clang to hit an `llvm_unreachable` and crash. In the following example, the second declaration (the function definition) should inherit the `target_clones` attribute from the first declaration (the forward declaration): ``` __attribute__((target_clones("arch=atom", "default"))) void foo(void); void foo(void) { /* ... */ } ``` However, `CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl()` was not recognizing the function definition as a redeclaration of the forward declaration, which prevented `Sema::MergeFunctionDecl()` from automatically inheriting the attribute. A side effect of this fix is that Clang now catches redeclarations of `target_clones` functions that have conflicting types, which previously caused Clang to crash by hitting that same `llvm_unreachable`. The `bad_overload1` case in `clang/test/Sema/attr-target-clones.c` has been updated to reflect this. Fixes llvm#165517 Fixes llvm#129483
This patch adds a case to
CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl()that detects redeclarations oftarget_clonesfunctions which omit the attribute, and makes sure they are marked as redeclarations. It also updates the comment at the call site ofCheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl()to reflect this.Previously,
target_clonesmultiversioned functions that omitted the attribute from subsequent declarations would cause Clang to hit anllvm_unreachableand crash. In the following example, the second declaration (the function definition) should inherit thetarget_clonesattribute from the first declaration (the forward declaration):However,
CheckMultiVersionAdditionalDecl()was not recognizing the function definition as a redeclaration of the forward declaration, which preventedSema::MergeFunctionDecl()from automatically inheriting the attribute.A side effect of this fix is that Clang now catches redeclarations of
target_clonesfunctions that have conflicting types, which previously caused Clang to crash by hitting that samellvm_unreachable. Thebad_overload1case inclang/test/Sema/attr-target-clones.chas been updated to reflect this.Fixes #165517
Fixes #129483