Skip to content

Conversation

@gru-agent
Copy link
Contributor

@gru-agent gru-agent bot commented May 4, 2025

Trigger Info

Trigger Type Triggered By Source File Assignment
Push arvinxx src/server/routers/edge/index.ts Detail

Summary

This PR introduces unit tests for the edgeRouter to ensure its functionality and structure. The tests include:

  1. Route Definitions: Verifies that all expected routes are defined within the edgeRouter. The routes tested are:

    • config.getDefaultAgentConfig

    • config.getGlobalConfig

    • healthcheck

    • market.getAgent

    • market.getAgentIndex

    • market.getPluginIndex

    • upload.createS3PreSignedUrl

  2. Health Check: Confirms that the healthcheck route returns the expected message "i'm live!".

  3. Router Namespaces: Ensures that all router namespaces (appStatus, config, healthcheck, market, upload) are correctly defined.

These tests improve the reliability and maintainability of the edgeRouter by validating its structure and behavior.

Coverage

The change in coverage value, such as: 0% -> 50%, indicates that the coverage was 0% before writing the tests and 50% after writing them.

https://web.dev/articles/ta-code-coverage

Type Change
lines 0% -> 100% 🔺
functions 0% -> 100% 🔺
statements 0% -> 100% 🔺
branches 0% -> 100% 🔺
source program

Test Statuses

Status Change
passed 0 -> 3 🔺
failed 0 -> 0
skipped 0 -> 0
source program

Tip

You can @gru-agent and leave your feedback. TestGru will make adjustments based on your input

Tip

You can @gru-agent rebase to rebase the PR.

Tip

You can @gru-agent redo to reset or rebase before redoing the PR.

Tip

To modify the test code yourself, click here Edit Test Code

@gru-agent gru-agent bot requested a review from arvinxx May 4, 2025 00:55
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 4, 2025
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 4, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
lobe-chat-database ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 4, 2025 1:19am
lobe-chat-preview ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview May 4, 2025 1:19am

@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

👍 @gru-agent[bot]

Thank you for raising your pull request and contributing to our Community
Please make sure you have followed our contributing guidelines. We will review it as soon as possible.
If you encounter any problems, please feel free to connect with us.
非常感谢您提出拉取请求并为我们的社区做出贡献,请确保您已经遵循了我们的贡献指南,我们会尽快审查它。
如果您遇到任何问题,请随时与我们联系。

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.33%. Comparing base (1ece6f6) to head (0895ff1).
⚠️ Report is 731 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7701      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.39%   88.33%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         815      819       +4     
  Lines       59042    59137      +95     
  Branches     3878     5551    +1673     
==========================================
+ Hits        52192    52241      +49     
- Misses       6850     6896      +46     
Flag Coverage Δ
app 88.33% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
server 95.74% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@arvinxx arvinxx closed this Aug 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants