Pasting text only is incredibly slow

[sdasda7777]

Search first

• I searched and no similar issues were found

What Happened?

I tried pasting the content of Moby Dick to a new page. Logseq is now stuck (frozen) for 10+ minutes with barely any processor or memory usage.

Reproduce the Bug

1. Copy all from Moby Dick
2. Go to a new page in Logseq, press Ctrl+Shift+V

Expected Behavior

I would expect the process to finish. Furthermore, the operation should take at most 30 seconds. Anything more points to severely ineffective usage of the hardware.

Screenshots

No response

Desktop or Mobile Platform Information

Windows 10, Logseq 0.9.17

Additional Context

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR? If you know how to fix the bug.

• I'm willing to submit a PR (Thank you!)

[roytruelove]

Is this a reasonable use case that Logseq should support?

[sdasda7777]

Yes, I believe pasting is a core functionality that one expects from an editor.

[github-actions]

Hi There! 👋

We haven't seen any activity on this issue in a while 😴, and we just wanted to make sure that it's still relevant. If you're still experiencing this issue, you might find it helpful to update to the latest version of Logseq. The latest version includes bug fixes and new features that may help to resolve this issue, and you can download it from our website. If updating to the latest version doesn't help, please let us know by adding a comment 💬. We're here to help!

If the issue has been resolved or is no longer relevant, that's great news! 🎉
We'll go ahead and close this issue to keep our backlog organized. Please note that this issue will be closed automatically in 20 days if there is no further activity. If you need more time to resolve the issue or provide more information, please just let us know by adding a comment.

Access additional Logseq 🚀 resources:

• Forum: https://discuss.logseq.com
• Blog: https://blog.logseq.com
• Docs: https://docs.logseq.com

Thanks for your contributions to Logseq! If you have any other issues or feature requests, please don't hesitate to let us know. We always welcome pull requests too!

[sdasda7777]

No observable change in the behaviour at 0.10.7.

[github-actions]

Hi There! 👋

We haven't seen any activity on this issue in a while 😴, and we just wanted to make sure that it's still relevant. If you're still experiencing this issue, you might find it helpful to update to the latest version of Logseq. The latest version includes bug fixes and new features that may help to resolve this issue, and you can download it from our website. If updating to the latest version doesn't help, please let us know by adding a comment 💬. We're here to help!

If the issue has been resolved or is no longer relevant, that's great news! 🎉
We'll go ahead and close this issue to keep our backlog organized. Please note that this issue will be closed automatically in 20 days if there is no further activity. If you need more time to resolve the issue or provide more information, please just let us know by adding a comment.

Access additional Logseq 🚀 resources:

• Forum: https://discuss.logseq.com
• Blog: https://blog.logseq.com
• Docs: https://docs.logseq.com

Thanks for your contributions to Logseq! If you have any other issues or feature requests, please don't hesitate to let us know. We always welcome pull requests too!

[sdasda7777]

Not as far as I am aware, there have been no new stable releases since.

[github-actions]

Hi There! 👋

We haven't seen any activity on this issue in a while 😴, and we just wanted to make sure that it's still relevant. If you're still experiencing this issue, you might find it helpful to update to the latest version of Logseq. The latest version includes bug fixes and new features that may help to resolve this issue, and you can download it from our website. If updating to the latest version doesn't help, please let us know by adding a comment 💬. We're here to help!

If the issue has been resolved or is no longer relevant, that's great news! 🎉
We'll go ahead and close this issue to keep our backlog organized. Please note that this issue will be closed automatically in 20 days if there is no further activity. If you need more time to resolve the issue or provide more information, please just let us know by adding a comment.

Access additional Logseq 🚀 resources:

• Forum: https://discuss.logseq.com
• Blog: https://blog.logseq.com
• Docs: https://docs.logseq.com

Thanks for your contributions to Logseq! If you have any other issues or feature requests, please don't hesitate to let us know. We always welcome pull requests too!