Skip to content

Conversation

@bmuddha
Copy link
Contributor

@bmuddha bmuddha commented Nov 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal dependencies to latest versions.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@bmuddha bmuddha requested a review from thlorenz November 20, 2025 17:14
@github-actions
Copy link

Manual Deploy Available

You can trigger a manual deploy of this PR branch to testnet:

Deploy to Testnet 🚀

Alternative: Comment /deploy on this PR to trigger deployment directly.

⚠️ Note: Manual deploy requires authorization. Only authorized users can trigger deployments.

Comment updated automatically when the PR is synchronized.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated git revision for the solana-svm dependency from commit 11bbaf2 to e480fa2 in Cargo.toml, updating both workspace dependency and patch references to keep them in sync.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency revision update
Cargo.toml
Updated solana-svm git revision from 11bbaf2 to e480fa2 in workspace.dependencies and patch.crates-io sections

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

  • Verify that the new solana-svm revision e480fa2 is a valid commit and compatible with the current codebase
  • Confirm both references (workspace.dependencies and patch.crates-io) are correctly updated to maintain consistency

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat: use latest svm version' directly matches the main change—updating the solana-svm git revision to a newer commit.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bmuddha/feat/use-latest-svm

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e47b614 and 9591e17.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: thlorenz
Repo: magicblock-labs/magicblock-validator PR: 587
File: test-manual/Cargo.toml:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-26T16:54:39.084Z
Learning: In the magicblock-validator repository, use git branch references (not commit hashes or tags) for the helius-laserstream dependency to allow automatic updates when the branch is pushed to.
📚 Learning: 2025-10-26T16:54:39.084Z
Learnt from: thlorenz
Repo: magicblock-labs/magicblock-validator PR: 587
File: test-manual/Cargo.toml:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-26T16:54:39.084Z
Learning: In the magicblock-validator repository, use git branch references (not commit hashes or tags) for the helius-laserstream dependency to allow automatic updates when the branch is pushed to.

Applied to files:

  • Cargo.toml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: run_make_ci_lint
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Cargo.toml (1)

221-224: Consider using a git branch reference instead of a commit hash.

The changes update the solana-svm revision to a specific commit hash (e480fa2). However, based on established patterns in this repository, using git branch references instead of commit hashes enables automatic updates when the branch is pushed to, reducing maintenance burden.

From past feedback in this codebase: "use git branch references (not commit hashes or tags) for [external] dependency to allow automatic updates when the branch is pushed to."

If the intent is to pin to a specific commit for reproducibility or stability, this is acceptable, but consider documenting the rationale or discussing with the team whether a branch reference would be more appropriate here.

Can you clarify whether using a branch reference (e.g., branch = "main" or similar) would be more appropriate here, consistent with the repository's dependency management strategy?

Also applies to: 232-232


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@GabrielePicco GabrielePicco merged commit b5823d8 into master Nov 20, 2025
19 checks passed
@GabrielePicco GabrielePicco deleted the bmuddha/feat/use-latest-svm branch November 20, 2025 18:38
thlorenz added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2025
* master:
  feat: use latest svm version (#657)
  chore: update solana account (#660)
thlorenz added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
* master:
  feat: use latest svm version (#657)
  chore: update solana account (#660)
thlorenz added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
* master:
  feat: use latest svm version (#657)
  chore: update solana account (#660)
  fix: better transaction diagnostics & rent exemption check (#642)
  chore: add access-control-max-age header to cors (#654)
  fix(aperture): prevent racy getLatestBlockhash (#649)
  fix: await until sub is established and perform them in parallel (#650)
  feat: persist all accounts (#648)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants