Skip to content

Update releases#458

Merged
sriramveeraghanta merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
update-releases
Jun 4, 2026
Merged

Update releases#458
sriramveeraghanta merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
update-releases

Conversation

@danciaclara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@danciaclara danciaclara commented Jun 4, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced custom automations guide with webhook action support and condition logic clarification
    • Comprehensive releases documentation refresh covering setup, management, and workflow guidance
    • Updated feature tier classifications across documentation for accuracy

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 4, 2026 1:39pm

Request Review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates documentation for custom automations, releases, and feature tier classifications. Custom automations documentation is refined with expanded action types (Send webhook), template variable guidance, and conceptual explanations of automation execution flow. Releases documentation is restructured with workspace-level setup and new sections for release creation, work item linking, and release management. Feature tier badges are reclassified across three documentation files.

Changes

Custom Automations Documentation Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Automation setup and core UI flow
docs/automations/custom-automations.md
Condition and action setup steps refined with AND/OR logic clarification and deletion constraints for enabled automations.
Send webhook action and template variables documentation
docs/automations/custom-automations.md
Comprehensive Send webhook action guide with configuration, secret key handling, HMAC-SHA256 signature verification, delivery/retry behavior, and expanded comment template variable reference.
Automation execution flow and advanced behavior
docs/automations/custom-automations.md
Rewritten conceptual guide describing trigger → condition → action flow, project vs workspace distinction, scheduled automation constraints, and field registration timing on work item creation.

Releases Feature Documentation Rewrite

Layer / File(s) Summary
Setup, enablement, and release creation
docs/releases.md
Workspace-focused setup instructions with subsections for enabling releases, managing tags/labels, and creating releases with updated field reference and navigation guidance.
Working with releases in release and work item views
docs/releases.md
New sections documenting release tabs (Overview/Scope/Changelog), progress tracking by state groups, status behavior, bidirectional Releases property linking semantics, inline assignment across list/table/board views, and Release picker custom property workflow.
Managing releases (edit and delete)
docs/releases.md
Guidance for editing release properties and deleting releases with confirmation; clarifies that linked work items are not deleted.

Feature Tier Badge Updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Feature tier badge reclassification
docs/automations/overview.md, docs/core-concepts/issues/plane-query-language.md, docs/core-concepts/pages/editor-blocks.md
Automations due date reminder updated from Enterprise Grid warning to Business tip; Plane Query Language from Enterprise Grid to Pro; AI block from info/Pro to tip/Business.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

Poem

🐰 Docs dance and reshape with care,
Webhooks whisper through the air,
Releases now find their way home,
Tier badges in new colors roam,
Words rewritten, guides made bright—
This PR paints the docs just right!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Update releases' is vague and generic. While it's partially related to the changeset (the PR does update releases documentation), it doesn't convey meaningful information about the primary changes and oversimplifies a multi-file documentation update. Consider a more descriptive title like 'Docs: Refactor releases guide and update feature tier badges' that captures both the main releases documentation restructuring and the related badge/tier updates across multiple docs.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch update-releases

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
docs/automations/custom-automations.md (1)

1-302: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Formatting check is currently CI-blocking.

Line 1 onward: oxfmt --check is failing for this file set, so this PR cannot pass formatting CI until formatter output is applied. Please run the formatter and commit the result before merge.

As per coding guidelines, "**/*: Run pnpm fix:format before committing and ensure CI check via pnpm check:format passes; formatting is enforced".

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/automations/custom-automations.md` around lines 1 - 302, The file fails
the repository formatter check (oxfmt --check) and CI requires formatted output;
run the project's formatting commands (pnpm fix:format or run oxfmt on the docs)
to reformat the "Custom automations" markdown, verify with pnpm check:format (or
oxfmt --check) and commit the updated file so CI passes; ensure you only change
whitespace/formatting and do not alter content.
docs/releases.md (1)

1-234: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Fix formatting to unblock CI

Formatting is currently failing (oxfmt --check). Please run the repo formatter and re-run format checks before merge.

As per coding guidelines, "Run pnpm fix:format before committing and ensure CI check via pnpm check:format passes; formatting is enforced".

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/releases.md` around lines 1 - 234, Formatting check is failing for
docs/releases.md (oxfmt --check); run the repo formatter and commit the fixed
file: run the project formatting script (pnpm fix:format) locally to reformat
this file (or run oxfmt on docs/releases.md), verify with pnpm check:format (or
oxfmt --check) and then update the commit/PR so CI passes; reference the repo
formatting scripts (pnpm fix:format and pnpm check:format) when making the
change.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/automations/custom-automations.md`:
- Around line 176-178: Update the fenced code block that currently contains
"This item has been moved to a new state. Current priority: {{priority}}. Please
check if the due date needs updating." by adding a language identifier (e.g.,
text) after the opening triple backticks so the block becomes ```text ... ```,
ensuring markdown linting passes; locate the block by searching for that exact
string in docs/automations/custom-automations.md and replace the opening ```
with ```text.

---

Outside diff comments:
In `@docs/automations/custom-automations.md`:
- Around line 1-302: The file fails the repository formatter check (oxfmt
--check) and CI requires formatted output; run the project's formatting commands
(pnpm fix:format or run oxfmt on the docs) to reformat the "Custom automations"
markdown, verify with pnpm check:format (or oxfmt --check) and commit the
updated file so CI passes; ensure you only change whitespace/formatting and do
not alter content.

In `@docs/releases.md`:
- Around line 1-234: Formatting check is failing for docs/releases.md (oxfmt
--check); run the repo formatter and commit the fixed file: run the project
formatting script (pnpm fix:format) locally to reformat this file (or run oxfmt
on docs/releases.md), verify with pnpm check:format (or oxfmt --check) and then
update the commit/PR so CI passes; reference the repo formatting scripts (pnpm
fix:format and pnpm check:format) when making the change.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 914d4884-638a-4656-9f01-0158f7cb6295

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 148e29c and 480a4c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • docs/automations/custom-automations.md
  • docs/automations/overview.md
  • docs/core-concepts/issues/plane-query-language.md
  • docs/core-concepts/pages/editor-blocks.md
  • docs/releases.md

Comment on lines 176 to 178
```
This item has been moved to a new state. Current priority: {{priority}}. Please check if the due date needs updating.
```
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Add a language identifier to the fenced code block.

Line 176 uses a plain triple-backtick block; specify the language (e.g., text) to satisfy markdown linting and keep docs lint-clean.

Proposed fix
-```
+```text
 This item has been moved to a new state. Current priority: {{priority}}. Please check if the due date needs updating.
</details>

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)</summary>

[warning] 176-176: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</details>

</details>

<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @docs/automations/custom-automations.md around lines 176 - 178, Update the
fenced code block that currently contains "This item has been moved to a new
state. Current priority: {{priority}}. Please check if the due date needs
updating." by adding a language identifier (e.g., text) after the opening triple
backticks so the block becomes text ... , ensuring markdown linting
passes; locate the block by searching for that exact string in
docs/automations/custom-automations.md and replace the opening withtext.


</details>

<!-- fingerprinting:phantom:triton:hawk -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->

@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta merged commit 147fe5f into master Jun 4, 2026
5 checks passed
@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta deleted the update-releases branch June 4, 2026 14:57
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2026
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants