Skip to content

Conversation

@Prashant-Surya
Copy link
Member

@Prashant-Surya Prashant-Surya commented Aug 6, 2025

Description

  • Remove read only access for github action to publish package

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow configuration for publishing without changing any user-facing features.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow file for publishing the Node SDK was updated by removing the explicit permissions block that previously granted contents: read. No other parts of the workflow or logic were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Workflow Permissions Update
.github/workflows/publish-node-sdk.yml
Removed the explicit permissions block (contents: read) from the workflow configuration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A bunny hopped through YAML fields,
Tweaked permissions, no big deals.
With a snip and a hop,
The contents: read did drop—
Now workflows run, light as wheels! 🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/fix-github-release-action

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/publish-node-sdk.yml (1)

17-22: Optional: speed up builds by caching npm dependencies

npm ci downloads the full dependency graph on every run. Adding the built-in actions/setup-node cache (or actions/cache) can shave minutes off the workflow.

      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: "20"
          registry-url: "https://registry.npmjs.org"
+          cache: 'npm'

Nice-to-have but not required for the fix.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ee0c7a and 8cc8641.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/publish-node-sdk.yml (1 hunks)

Comment on lines 7 to 10
publish:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read

steps:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Missing contents: write permission – release creation will still fail

The previous permissions block was entirely removed. Omitting it doesn’t grant broader rights—the default for the GITHUB_TOKEN remains read-only, so softprops/action-gh-release won’t be able to create the release.
Add an explicit contents: write (optionally narrowed to just the job) instead of deleting the block.

   publish:
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    permissions:
+      contents: write

Without this change the workflow will continue to error out on the “Create GitHub Release” step.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
publish:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
steps:
publish:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: write
steps:
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/publish-node-sdk.yml around lines 7 to 10, the permissions
block was removed, causing the GITHUB_TOKEN to have only read access by default.
This prevents the release creation step from succeeding. Add back a permissions
block with at least contents: write permission scoped to the job to allow the
release creation action to work properly.

@Prashant-Surya Prashant-Surya merged commit 03cc30b into main Aug 6, 2025
1 check passed
@Prashant-Surya Prashant-Surya deleted the chore/fix-github-release-action branch August 6, 2025 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants