Skip to content

Conversation

@anmolsinghbhatia
Copy link
Collaborator

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia commented Aug 16, 2024

Changes:

This PR resolves the issue related to the notification message when an issue is deleted.

Reference:

[WEB-2238]

Media:

Before After
before after

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for notification of deleted items, enhancing tracking capabilities.
  • Improvements

    • Updated the notification display logic to ensure deleted notifications do not show irrelevant details, improving clarity for users.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance the notification system by adding a new verb, "deleted," to the TNotificationData type. This allows the application to handle notifications more effectively by distinguishing between created, updated, and deleted items. Additionally, the NotificationItem component has been refined to ensure that notifications marked as deleted are not displayed, improving the user interface by presenting only relevant information.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/types/src/workspace-notifications.d.ts Added a new value "deleted" to the verb property of TNotificationData, expanding its semantic scope for notification actions.
web/core/components/workspace-notifications/sidebar/notification-card/item.tsx Enhanced the rendering logic in the NotificationItem component to conditionally hide deleted notifications, improving clarity by preventing irrelevant information from displaying.

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, I hop with glee,
Notifications fresh, as bright as can be!
With "deleted" now added, the clarity's bright,
We’ll show only the news that feels just right.
So let’s celebrate changes, both nifty and neat,
A hop and a skip, it's a coding treat! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1757b36 and 4e6181e.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/types/src/workspace-notifications.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/workspace-notifications/sidebar/notification-card/item.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/types/src/workspace-notifications.d.ts (1)

31-31: Addition of "deleted" verb is approved, but verify its usage.

The addition of "deleted" to the verb field enhances the semantic scope of TNotificationData. Ensure that all parts of the codebase that utilize this type are compatible with the new value.

web/core/components/workspace-notifications/sidebar/notification-card/item.tsx (1)

107-135: Conditional check for "deleted" verb is approved, but verify rendering logic for other verbs.

The conditional check ensures that notifications with the "deleted" verb are not rendered, improving the user interface. Verify that the rendering logic for other verbs remains consistent and accurate.

Verification successful

Rendering Logic for Notifications is Consistent and Accurate

The rendering logic for notifications effectively handles different verbs and fields. The logic for excluding the "deleted" verb is correctly implemented, and other scenarios are managed as expected. No issues found with the current implementation.

  • The "comment" field renders as "commented".
  • The "archived_at" field checks for "restore" to render "restored the issue" or "archived the issue".
  • Other fields use replaceUnderscoreIfSnakeCase.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify rendering logic for notifications with different verbs to ensure consistency.

# Test: Search for rendering logic related to `notification?.data?.issue_activity.verb`. Expect: Consistent handling for all verbs.
rg --type tsx 'notification\?.data\?.issue_activity\.verb'

Length of output: 88


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate .tsx files and search for rendering logic related to `notification?.data?.issue_activity.verb`

# Find all .tsx files and search for the pattern
fd --extension tsx --exec rg 'notification\?.data\?.issue_activity\.verb' {}

Length of output: 282


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract more context around lines that handle `notification?.data?.issue_activity.verb`

# Find all .tsx files and extract lines around the pattern for better context
fd --extension tsx --exec rg 'notification\?.data\?.issue_activity\.verb' -A 5 -B 5 {}

Length of output: 1300

@SatishGandham SatishGandham merged commit d60e988 into preview Aug 16, 2024
@SatishGandham SatishGandham deleted the fix-issue-delete-notification-message branch August 16, 2024 11:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants