[WEB-1964]chore: cycle store restructuring #6405
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes across multiple files related to cycle management in a web application. The modifications primarily involve adding a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
web/ce/components/cycles/end-cycle/modal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-14: Add implementation for the EndCycleModal component.The component is currently empty, returning just a fragment. Either implement the component or provide a reason for the empty implementation in the code comments.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
web/core/components/cycles/list/cycle-list-item-action.tsx (2)
88-88: Improve readability of the showTransferIssues condition.Consider extracting the condition into a more readable format:
-const showTransferIssues = routerProjectId && cycleDetails.pending_issues > 0 && cycleStatus === "completed"; +const showTransferIssues = Boolean( + routerProjectId && + cycleDetails.pending_issues > 0 && + cycleStatus === "completed" +);
Line range hint
1-324: Consider breaking down this component for better maintainability.This component has multiple responsibilities including:
- Form handling
- Date management
- Favorites management
- Transfer issues
- UI rendering
Consider splitting it into smaller, focused components to improve maintainability and testing.
Some suggestions:
- Extract form logic into a custom hook
- Move date handling into a separate component
- Create a separate component for favorites management
- Split the UI into smaller, reusable components
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
web/ce/components/cycles/end-cycle/modal.tsx(1 hunks)web/ce/store/cycle/index.ts(1 hunks)web/core/components/cycles/list/cycle-list-item-action.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/cycles/quick-actions.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/hooks/store/use-cycle.ts(1 hunks)web/ee/store/cycle/index.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- web/ee/store/cycle/index.ts
- web/ce/store/cycle/index.ts
- web/core/hooks/store/use-cycle.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
web/ce/components/cycles/end-cycle/modal.tsx (1)
10-10: Consider making cycleName optional or add validation.Since this is a new property, consider:
- Making it optional with
cycleName?: stringif it's not always required- Adding validation to ensure non-empty strings if it's required
Let's check how this property is used across the codebase:
web/core/components/cycles/quick-actions.tsx (1)
180-180: LGTM! Proper null checking and data passing.The addition of the
cycleNameprop is well-implemented with appropriate null checking through thecycleDetailsconditional.
Description
Chore Cycle restructuring.
Type of Change
References
WEB-1964
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
cycleNameproperty to theEndCycleModalcomponent, allowing display of the specific cycle name.Refactor
ICycleStoretype in various files.