[WEB-5350] migration: navigation#8156
Conversation
|
You have run out of free Bugbot PR reviews for this billing cycle. This will reset on December 20. To receive reviews on all of your PRs, visit the Cursor dashboard to activate Pro and start your 14-day free trial. |
WalkthroughTwo new fields were added to WorkspaceUserProperties: Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
sangeethailango
changed the title
|
Linked to Plane Work Item(s) This comment was auto-generated by Plane |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py (1)
318-318: Consider using PositiveIntegerField for num_of_projects.Since
num_of_projectsrepresents a count, it should likely be constrained to non-negative values. UsingIntegerFieldallows negative values, which may not be semantically valid.Apply this diff to use PositiveIntegerField:
- num_of_projects = models.IntegerField(default=10) + num_of_projects = models.PositiveIntegerField(default=10)Additionally, consider adding
help_textto clarify what this field represents (e.g., "Number of projects to display in navigation").
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0109_issuecomment_description_and_parent_id.py(1 hunks)apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py (1)
apps/api/plane/utils/exporters/schemas/base.py (1)
BooleanField(97-105)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0109_issuecomment_description_and_parent_id.py (1)
apps/api/plane/utils/exporters/schemas/base.py (1)
BooleanField(97-105)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py (1)
319-319: LGTM! Navigation preference field is well-defined.The
is_horizontal_navigation_barfield uses an appropriate type and default for storing user navigation preferences.Consider adding
help_text(e.g., "Whether to display horizontal navigation bar") for better documentation if this is a pattern followed elsewhere in the codebase.apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0109_issuecomment_description_and_parent_id.py (1)
24-33: Migration is consistent with model definition.The migration operations correctly add both
is_horizontal_navigation_barandnum_of_projectsfields with types and defaults that match the model definition. Since both fields have defaults, existing rows will be safely updated without requiring backfills.Note: If you apply the
PositiveIntegerFieldsuggestion from the model review, remember to update line 32 in this migration accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py (1)
322-322: Consider adding validation constraints for project limit.The
navigation_project_limitfield currently accepts any integer value, including negative numbers or unreasonably large values. Consider adding validators to ensure the value is within a reasonable range.Example with validation:
from django.core.validators import MinValueValidator, MaxValueValidator navigation_project_limit = models.IntegerField( default=10, validators=[MinValueValidator(1), MaxValueValidator(100)] )Adjust the min/max values based on your business requirements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0109_issuecomment_description_and_parent_id.py(1 hunks)apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0109_issuecomment_description_and_parent_id.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py (1)
323-327: Field implementation looks good once spelling is corrected.The
navigation_control_preferencefield is properly structured with appropriate max_length and default value. Once the spelling error inNavigationControlPreference.ACCORDIANis fixed (see previous comment), this field will be ready.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0110_workspaceuserproperties_navigation_control_preference_and_more.py (1)
18-22: Verify the default limit and consider adding validation.The default value of 10 for the project limit appears reasonable, but please confirm this aligns with product requirements. Additionally, consider adding validation constraints to ensure data integrity (e.g., positive values only).
If you'd like to add validation, you can apply this diff:
+from django.core.validators import MinValueValidator + ... migrations.AddField( model_name='workspaceuserproperties', name='navigation_project_limit', - field=models.IntegerField(default=10), + field=models.IntegerField(default=10, validators=[MinValueValidator(1)]), ),Note: You'll also need to update the model definition in
apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.pyto include the same validator.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0110_workspaceuserproperties_navigation_control_preference_and_more.py(1 hunks)apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0110_workspaceuserproperties_navigation_control_preference_and_more.py (1)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0109_issuecomment_description_and_parent_id.py (1)
Migration(7-24)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0110_workspaceuserproperties_navigation_control_preference_and_more.py (1)
1-10: LGTM!Migration structure and dependencies are correctly defined.
...i/plane/db/migrations/0110_workspaceuserproperties_navigation_control_preference_and_more.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py (1)
304-307: Navigation preference enum and fields are consistent; consider validating the limit.
NavigationControlPreferenceandnavigation_control_preferenceare wired correctly (choices + default) and align with the newnavigation_project_limitfield; schema looks good and matches the described behavior.If
navigation_project_limitshould never be zero/negative, consider tightening it withPositiveIntegerFieldor aMinValueValidator(1)to prevent bad data sneaking in from API/admin usage.Also applies to: 322-327
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0110_workspaceuserproperties_navigation_control_preference_and_more.py(1 hunks)apps/api/plane/db/models/workspace.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0110_workspaceuserproperties_navigation_control_preference_and_more.py (1)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0109_issuecomment_description_and_parent_id.py (1)
Migration(7-24)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0110_workspaceuserproperties_navigation_control_preference_and_more.py (1)
1-23: Migration matches model schema and defaults.The added fields, choices, and defaults are in sync with
WorkspaceUserPropertiesinworkspace.py, and the dependency chain looks correct for applying this as a straightforward schema migration.
* migration: navigation related fields in workspace_user_properties * fix: field names * fix: remove max_length * fix: create new migration * fix: typo * Renamed horizontal preference to tabbed --------- Co-authored-by: Dheeraj Kumar Ketireddy <dheeru0198@gmail.com>
* migration: navigation related fields in workspace_user_properties * fix: field names * fix: remove max_length * fix: create new migration * fix: typo * Renamed horizontal preference to tabbed --------- Co-authored-by: Dheeraj Kumar Ketireddy <dheeru0198@gmail.com>
* migration: navigation related fields in workspace_user_properties * fix: field names * fix: remove max_length * fix: create new migration * fix: typo * Renamed horizontal preference to tabbed --------- Co-authored-by: Dheeraj Kumar Ketireddy <dheeru0198@gmail.com>
4 participants
Description
Added new fields related to navigation.
Type of Change
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.