chore: update CODEOWNERS for apps and deployments

[sriramveeraghanta]

Summary

• Assign per-app code owners: apps/api, apps/web, apps/space, apps/admin, apps/live
• Keep existing owners for .oxlintrc.json, .oxfmtrc.json, and deployments/

Test plan

• GitHub recognizes CODEOWNERS syntax (no parse warnings on the PR)
• Reviews auto-request the listed owners on matching paths

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated code ownership mappings for configuration files and application/deployment directories to streamline review routing and maintenance responsibilities.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 2d9a575e-4a6d-4ce3-b9fa-928ad38ddfa6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7514cf and e715f3e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• CODEOWNERS

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• CODEOWNERS

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated the CODEOWNERS file to add ownership entries for lint/format config files and to assign directory-level ownership for several app and deployment directories; the existing eslint.config.mjs ownership entry was left unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CODEOWNERS CODEOWNERS	Added ownership entries for config files .oxlintrc.json and .oxfmtrc.json, and directory-level ownership for apps/api/, apps/web/, apps/space/, apps/admin/, apps/live/, and deployments/. Existing eslint.config.mjs entry unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 I hopped through lines to mark each door,
Quietly naming who tends each floor.
Configs and apps now have a guide,
Paths assigned, no change to the tide.
A tidy map — I twitch with pride.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The description provides a summary and test plan but is missing required sections from the template (Type of Change, Screenshots, detailed description).	Complete the PR description by adding the Type of Change section and any other missing template sections for consistency with repository standards.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately and concisely summarizes the main change: updating CODEOWNERS for apps and deployments directories.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/update-codeowners

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Updates repository CODEOWNERS to reflect per-application ownership and deployment ownership rules so GitHub can auto-request reviews for changes in those areas.

Changes:

• Add CODEOWNERS entries for .oxlintrc.json and .oxfmtrc.json
• Add per-app ownership rules for apps/api, apps/web, apps/space, apps/admin, apps/live
• Add ownership rule for deployments/ (and remove the old eslint.config.mjs rule)

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

CODEOWNERS (1)

1-8: Consider consistent whitespace formatting.

The spacing between path patterns and owner assignments appears inconsistent across lines. While this doesn't affect GitHub's parsing of the CODEOWNERS file, standardizing to consistent spacing (e.g., single space or aligned columns) would improve readability and maintainability.

📝 Optional formatting improvement

-.oxlintrc.json   `@sriramveeraghanta` `@lifeiscontent`
-.oxfmtrc.json   `@sriramveeraghanta` `@lifeiscontent`
-apps/api/           `@dheeru0198` `@pablohashescobar`
-apps/web/           `@sriramveeraghanta`
-apps/space/         `@sriramveeraghanta`
-apps/admin/         `@sriramveeraghanta`
-apps/live/          `@Palanikannan1437`
-deployments/        `@mguptahub` `@pratapalakshmi`
+.oxlintrc.json `@sriramveeraghanta` `@lifeiscontent`
+.oxfmtrc.json `@sriramveeraghanta` `@lifeiscontent`
+apps/api/ `@dheeru0198` `@pablohashescobar`
+apps/web/ `@sriramveeraghanta`
+apps/space/ `@sriramveeraghanta`
+apps/admin/ `@sriramveeraghanta`
+apps/live/ `@Palanikannan1437`
+deployments/ `@mguptahub` `@pratapalakshmi`

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@CODEOWNERS` around lines 1 - 8, Standardize spacing in the CODEOWNERS entries
so each path pattern (e.g., .oxlintrc.json, .oxfmtrc.json, apps/api/, apps/web/,
apps/space/, apps/admin/, apps/live/, deployments/) is followed by a consistent
delimiter spacing before the owner list; pick either a single space or aligned
columns and update all lines to match that convention to improve readability and
maintainability.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@CODEOWNERS`:
- Around line 1-8: Standardize spacing in the CODEOWNERS entries so each path
pattern (e.g., .oxlintrc.json, .oxfmtrc.json, apps/api/, apps/web/, apps/space/,
apps/admin/, apps/live/, deployments/) is followed by a consistent delimiter
spacing before the owner list; pick either a single space or aligned columns and
update all lines to match that convention to improve readability and
maintainability.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3a5715be-7b75-4182-b273-63885cb22e5b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da41f14 and c7514cf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• CODEOWNERS