You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The FAA previously made aeronautical chart data available in vector form, which gave companies like Garmin, Jeppesen, and ForeFlight a head start building proprietary vector chart databases. That data is no longer publicly distributed in chart-ready form. Today the FAA publishes the raster GeoTIFF sectionals (what pyAvMap currently uses) as its official chart product.
What the FAA Actually Publishes in Vector Form
The FAA does publish the underlying component data — not a finished chart:
Dataset
Format
Cycle
Content
NASR Subscriber Files
Fixed-width text / CSV / AIXM 5.1 XML
28-day
Airports, navaids, airways, fixes, Class B/C/D/E airspace, MOAs, restricted/prohibited areas
FAA ArcGIS Open Data Portal
Shapefile / GeoJSON
Varies
Airspace boundaries, airport locations
CIFP
ARINC 424
28-day
Instrument procedures only
DOF (Digital Obstacle File)
Text
45-day
Towers and obstacles
This is raw data — not a cartographic product. To turn it into a usable chart you have to do the work Garmin and Jeppesen did: project the data, define symbology, handle label placement, resolve visual conflicts, and tune legibility at multiple zoom levels. That is a substantial engineering and design effort.
Realistic Near-Term Path: NASR Overlay Layers on Raster Base
The achievable improvement is adding vector overlay layers on top of the existing raster tiles — not replacing the raster base:
Airspace boundaries (Class B/C/D/E, MOA, Restricted) — NASR shapefiles, draw as semi-transparent polygons with FAA colour coding
Airport symbols — NASR airport data, replace the static chart symbol with a live clickable marker
VORs / NDBs / fixes — NASR navaid data, drawn over the chart
Obstacle highlights — DOF, drawn near terrain
TFRs — FAA TFR API, drawn as red boundary (see companion issue)
This approach keeps the FAA raster chart as the base (all the cartographic work already done) and adds data-driven layers on top. It is essentially what SkyVector and VFRMap do.
Longer-Term: Full Vector Renderer
A complete replacement of the raster base with a from-scratch vector renderer is technically feasible but is a significant multi-year project:
This would make pyAvMap comparable to Garmin Pilot or ForeFlight in chart type — and would eliminate the per-chart download burden (~65 MB per sectional × 75 sectionals ≈ 5 GB). Worth tracking as a long-term goal, but not a near-term deliverable.
Background
The FAA previously made aeronautical chart data available in vector form, which gave companies like Garmin, Jeppesen, and ForeFlight a head start building proprietary vector chart databases. That data is no longer publicly distributed in chart-ready form. Today the FAA publishes the raster GeoTIFF sectionals (what pyAvMap currently uses) as its official chart product.
What the FAA Actually Publishes in Vector Form
The FAA does publish the underlying component data — not a finished chart:
This is raw data — not a cartographic product. To turn it into a usable chart you have to do the work Garmin and Jeppesen did: project the data, define symbology, handle label placement, resolve visual conflicts, and tune legibility at multiple zoom levels. That is a substantial engineering and design effort.
Realistic Near-Term Path: NASR Overlay Layers on Raster Base
The achievable improvement is adding vector overlay layers on top of the existing raster tiles — not replacing the raster base:
This approach keeps the FAA raster chart as the base (all the cartographic work already done) and adds data-driven layers on top. It is essentially what SkyVector and VFRMap do.
Longer-Term: Full Vector Renderer
A complete replacement of the raster base with a from-scratch vector renderer is technically feasible but is a significant multi-year project:
This would make pyAvMap comparable to Garmin Pilot or ForeFlight in chart type — and would eliminate the per-chart download burden (~65 MB per sectional × 75 sectionals ≈ 5 GB). Worth tracking as a long-term goal, but not a near-term deliverable.
Recommended Priority
Related
🤖 Generated with Claude Code