Conversation
osana
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2017
| assertEquals("Wrong length.", expectedLength, latLngs.size()); | ||
|
|
||
| Point lastPoint = latLngs.get(expectedLength - 1); | ||
| expectNearNumber(37.76953, lastPoint.latitude(), 1e-6); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should we use a Constants.PRECISION_6 ?
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The TEST_LINE was originally written for precision 5 a long, long time ago ;)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #633
Even with an empty list or path string, the returned results for all PolylineUtils results in a nonnull value, thus annotating the methods will help developers know they can skip over this check.