Skip to content

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ rubocop (1.81.7 → 1.82.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.82.0

New features

  • #14655: Add AllowRBSInlineAnnotation option to Layout/LineLength. (@koic)
  • #14569: Add IncludedMacroPatterns configuration option to Style/MethodCallWithArgsParentheses for pattern-based macro method enforcement. (@mmenanno)
  • #14670: Add new cop Style/ModuleMemberExistenceCheck. (@lovro-bikic)
  • #14644: Support TargetRubyVersion 4.0 (experimental). (@koic)

Bug fixes

  • #14649: Fix an error for Lint/LiteralAsCondition when there are literals in multiple branches. (@viralpraxis)
  • #14678: Fix an error when running deprecated rake rubocop:auto_correct task. (@koic)
  • #14650: Fix wrong autocorrect for Lint/RedundantSplatExpansion when splatting a single literal. (@earlopain)
  • #14703: Fix false negatives for Layout/RescueEnsureAlignment when using self class definition. (@koic)
  • #14706: Fix false negatives for Lint/NoReturnInBeginEndBlocks when assigning instance variable, class variable, global variable, or constant. (@koic)
  • #14715: Fix false positives for Layout/EmptyLineAfterGuardClause when a guard clause follows a multiline heredoc in a parenthesized method call. (@koic)
  • #14667: Fix false positives for Layout/EndAlignment when a conditional assignment is used on the same line and the end with a safe navigation method call is aligned. (@koic)
  • #14688: Fix false positives for Layout/EndAlignment when a conditional assignment is used on the same line and the end with a numbered block or it block method call is aligned. (@koic)
  • #14699: Fix false positives for Lint/RedundantSafeNavigation when the receiver is used outside the singleton method definition scope. (@koic)
  • #14663: Fix false positives for Style/EndlessMethod when multiline or xstring heredoc is used in method body. (@koic)
  • #10173: Fix false positives for Style/TrailingCommaInArguments when EnforcedStyleForMultiline is set to consistent_comma and a multiline braced hash argument appears after another argument. (@koic)
  • #14680: Handle all OptionParser errors when running rubocop with input that causes an error. (@dvandersluis)
  • #14658: Fix incorrect behavior when Layout/LineLength is disabled. (@koic)
  • #14704: Fix incorrect Position character value in LSP. (@tmtm)
  • #14619: Store remote configuration caches in cache root. (@Jack12816)
  • #14476: Fix Style/ClassAndModuleChildren to skip compact style definitions inside another class or module when EnforcedStyle: nested. (@rscq)
  • #14281: Update Layout/EndAlignment with EnforcedStyleAlignWith: variable to handle conditionals inside begin nodes properly. (@dvandersluis)

Changes

  • #14662: Add autocorrection for Lint/UselessOr. (@r7kamura)
  • #14668: Exclude Severity from configuration parameters. (@r7kamura)
  • #14684: Make Style/CaseEquality allow regexp case equality where the receiver is a regexp literal. (@koic)
  • #14645: Change Lint/CircularArgumentReference to detect offenses within long assignment chains. (@viralpraxis)
  • #14642: Make Gemspec/RubyVersionGlobalsUsage aware of Ruby::VERSION. (@koic)
  • #14695: Make Layout/EmptyLineAfterMagicComment aware of # rbs_inline magic comment. (@koic)
  • #10147: Make Lint/ElseLayout allow a single-line else body in then single-line conditional. (@koic)
  • #14661: Make Lint/RedundantRequireStatement aware of pathname when analyzing Ruby 4.0. (@koic)
  • #14698: Make Lint/UnreachableCode aware of singleton method redefinition. (@koic)
  • #14677: Make Style/RedundantArgument aware of to_i. (@koic)
  • #14660: Rename IgnoreCopDirectives to AllowCopDirectives in Layout/LineLength. (@koic)
  • #14492: Revert #14492, which added support for LSP positionEncoding 'utf-8' and 'utf-32' due to critical performance regression reports. (@koic)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ unicode-emoji (indirect, 4.1.0 → 4.2.0) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 10 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Dec 18, 2025
@digitaltom digitaltom merged commit 779d380 into main Dec 18, 2025
6 checks passed
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/rubocop-1.82.0 branch December 18, 2025 12:57
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 20336830854

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 99.346%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 20336661154: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 760
Relevant Lines: 765

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants