JOSS: Add more complete Zenodo reference info #481
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Addresses openjournals/joss-reviews#5995 (comment). Namely, I used a minimal format for the Zenodo references. Now, I have used the one auto-generated by Zenodo. One downside of this approach is that the author list includes all contributors to the repo, no matter how large or small their contributions are. I see two ways to go about this: 1) Just accept it and move on. 2) Keep the rest of the metadata but remove the `author` field. @utf, any thoughts?
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #481 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.86% 99.86%
=======================================
Files 20 20
Lines 1508 1508
Branches 415 415
=======================================
Hits 1506 1506
Misses 2 2 |
Member
|
Happy to just accept it! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses openjournals/joss-reviews#5995 (comment).
Namely, I previously used a minimal format for the Zenodo references. Now, I have used the one auto-generated by Zenodo. One downside of this approach is that the author list includes all contributors to the repo, no matter how large or small their contributions are.
I see two ways to go about this:
Just accept it and move on.
Keep the rest of the metadata but remove the
authorfield.@utf, any thoughts?