forked from ray-project/ray
    
        
        - 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 0
 
[tune](deps): Bump nevergrad from 0.4.2.post5 to 0.4.3.post4 in /python/requirements/tune #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Closed
      
      
            dependabot
  wants to merge
  1
  commit into
  master
from
dependabot/pip/python/requirements/tune/nevergrad-0.4.3.post4
  
      
      
   
      
    
                
     Closed
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    Bumps [nevergrad](https://github.com/facebookresearch/nevergrad) from 0.4.2.post5 to 0.4.3.post4. - [Release notes](https://github.com/facebookresearch/nevergrad/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/facebookresearch/nevergrad/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](facebookresearch/nevergrad@0.4.2.post5...0.4.3.post4) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: nevergrad dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
| 
           Superseded by #20.  | 
    
    
  matthewdeng 
      pushed a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Sep 10, 2021 
    
    
  
    
  matthewdeng 
      pushed a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Sep 21, 2021 
    
    
  
    
  matthewdeng 
      pushed a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 19, 2022 
    
    
  
    
  matthewdeng 
      pushed a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 28, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
We encountered SIGSEGV when running Python test `python/ray/tests/test_failure_2.py::test_list_named_actors_timeout`. The stack is: ``` #0 0x00007fffed30f393 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #1 0x00007fffee707649 in ray::RayLog::GetLoggerName() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #2 0x00007fffee70aa90 in ray::SpdLogMessage::Flush() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #3 0x00007fffee70af28 in ray::RayLog::~RayLog() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #4 0x00007fffee2b570d in ray::asio::testing::(anonymous namespace)::DelayManager::Init() [clone .constprop.0] () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #5 0x00007fffedd0d95a in _GLOBAL__sub_I_asio_chaos.cc () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #6 0x00007ffff7fe282a in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #7 0x00007ffff7fe2931 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #8 0x00007ffff7fe674c in dl_open_worker () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #9 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #10 0x00007ffff7fe5ffe in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #11 0x00007ffff7d5f39c in dlopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 #12 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #13 0x00007ffff7b82f13 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #14 0x00007ffff7d5fb09 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 #15 0x00007ffff7d5f42a in dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 #16 0x00007fffef04d330 in py_dl_open (self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at /tmp/python-build.20220507135524.257789/Python-3.7.11/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:1369 ``` The root cause is that when loading `_raylet.so`, `static DelayManager _delay_manager` is initialized and `RAY_LOG(ERROR) << "RAY_testing_asio_delay_us is set to " << delay_env;` is executed. However, the static variables declared in `logging.cc` are not initialized yet (in this case, `std::string RayLog::logger_name_ = "ray_log_sink"`). It's better not to rely on the initialization order of static variables in different compilation units because it's not guaranteed. I propose to change all `RAY_LOG`s to `std::cerr` in `DelayManager::Init()`. The crash happens in Ant's internal codebase. Not sure why this test case passes in the community version though. BTW, I've tried different approaches: 1. Using a static local variable in `get_delay_us` and remove the global variable. This doesn't work because `init()` needs to access the variable as well. 2. Defining the global variable as type `std::unique_ptr<DelayManager>` and initialize it in `get_delay_us`. This works but it requires a lock to be thread-safe.
    
  matthewdeng 
      pushed a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Nov 27, 2023 
    
    
  
    
  matthewdeng 
      pushed a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 4, 2024 
    
    
  
    
  matthewdeng 
      pushed a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Aug 21, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
… condition (ray-project#55367) ## Why are these changes needed? Workers crash with a fatal `RAY_CHECK` failure when the plasma store connection is broken during shutdown, causing the following error: ``` RAY_CHECK failed: PutInLocalPlasmaStore(object, object_id, true) Status not OK: IOError: Broken pipe ``` Stacktrace: ``` core_worker.cc:720 C Check failed: PutInLocalPlasmaStore(object, object_id, true) Status not OK: IOError: Broken pipe *** StackTrace Information *** /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0x141789a) [0x7924dd2c689a] ray::operator<<() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(_ZN3ray6RayLogD1Ev+0x479) [0x7924dd2c9319] ray::RayLog::~RayLog() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0x95cc8a) [0x7924dc80bc8a] ray::core::CoreWorker::CoreWorker()::{lambda()#13}::operator()() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(_ZN3ray4core11TaskManager27MarkTaskReturnObjectsFailedERKNS_17TaskSpecificationENS_3rpc9ErrorTypeEPKNS5_12RayErrorInfoERKN4absl12lts_2023080213flat_hash_setINS_8ObjectIDENSB_13hash_internal4HashISD_EESt8equal_toISD_ESaISD_EEE+0x679) [0x7924dc868f29] ray::core::TaskManager::MarkTaskReturnObjectsFailed() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(_ZN3ray4core11TaskManager15FailPendingTaskERKNS_6TaskIDENS_3rpc9ErrorTypeEPKNS_6StatusEPKNS5_12RayErrorInfoE+0x416) [0x7924dc86f186] ray::core::TaskManager::FailPendingTask() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0x9a90e6) [0x7924dc8580e6] ray::core::NormalTaskSubmitter::RequestNewWorkerIfNeeded()::{lambda()#1}::operator()() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(_ZN3ray3rpc14ClientCallImplINS0_23RequestWorkerLeaseReplyEE15OnReplyReceivedEv+0x68) [0x7924dc94aa48] ray::rpc::ClientCallImpl<>::OnReplyReceived() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(_ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFvvEZN3ray3rpc17ClientCallManager29PollEventsFromCompletionQueueEiEUlvE_E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_data+0x15) [0x7924dc79e285] std::_Function_handler<>::_M_invoke() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0xd9b4c8) [0x7924dcc4a4c8] EventTracker::RecordExecution() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0xd4648e) [0x7924dcbf548e] std::_Function_handler<>::_M_invoke() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0xd46906) [0x7924dcbf5906] boost::asio::detail::completion_handler<>::do_complete() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0x13f417b) [0x7924dd2a317b] boost::asio::detail::scheduler::do_run_one() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0x13f5af9) [0x7924dd2a4af9] boost::asio::detail::scheduler::run() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0x13f6202) [0x7924dd2a5202] boost::asio::io_context::run() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(_ZN3ray4core10CoreWorker12RunIOServiceEv+0x91) [0x7924dc793a61] ray::core::CoreWorker::RunIOService() /home/ray/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/_raylet.so(+0xcba0b0) [0x7924dcb690b0] thread_proxy /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x94ac3) [0x7924dde71ac3] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x126850) [0x7924ddf03850] ``` Stack trace flow: 1. Task lease request fails -> `NormalTaskSubmitter::RequestNewWorkerIfNeeded()` callback. 2. Triggers `TaskManager::FailPendingTask()` -> `MarkTaskReturnObjectsFailed()`. 3. System attempts to store error objects in plasma via `put_in_local_plasma_callback_`. 4. Plasma connection is broken (raylet/plasma store already shut down). 5. `RAY_CHECK_OK()` in the callback causes fatal crash instead of graceful handling. Root Cause: This is a shutdown ordering race condition: 1. Raylet shuts down first: The raylet stops its IO context ([main_service_.stop()](https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/77c5475195e56a26891d88460973198391d20edf/src/ray/object_manager/plasma/store_runner.cc#L146)) which closes plasma store connections. 2. Worker still processes callbacks: Core worker continues processing pending callbacks on separate threads. 3. Broken connection: When the callback tries to store error objects in plasma, the connection is already closed. 4. Fatal crash: The `RAY_CHECK_OK()` treats this as an unexpected error and crashes the process. Fix: 1. Shutdown-aware plasma operations - Add `CoreWorker::IsShuttingDown()` method to check shutdown state. - Skip plasma operations entirely when shutdown is in progress. - Prevents attempting operations on already-closed connections. 2. Targeted error handling for connection failures - Replace blanket `RAY_CHECK_OK()` with specific error type checking. - Handle connection errors (Broken pipe, Connection reset, Bad file descriptor) as warnings during shutdown scenarios. - Maintain `RAY_CHECK_OK()` for other error types to catch real issues. --------- Signed-off-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com>
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Bumps nevergrad from 0.4.2.post5 to 0.4.3.post4.
Release notes
Sourced from nevergrad's releases.
Changelog
Sourced from nevergrad's changelog.
... (truncated)
Commits
0b5a9baAdd sub-optim info for NGOpt and SplitOpt (#1137)3a5a114Use new ConfPortfolio API (#1124)7360f3aSimple new benchs (#1129)308092cMake Portfolio more generic (#1094)bf0a927Adding non-progressive NoisySplit (#1089)97c9e36New NgOpt (#1123)6fd743emax num vars in collaborative coevolution (#1120)ae1b9a3Improving our one-shot optimization methods (#1103)3f21757Ignore mypy for numpy sum axis (#1117)2fb7d17Update mixsimulator experiment (benchmark) (#1107)Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)