This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 31, 2025. It is now read-only.
Replies: 2 comments
|
Without looking at the code- it's probably the exact same thing. They are just exporting teleport on PiHole A and importing on PiHole B via API |
0 replies
|
I was still hoping for a release because local DNS wasn’t syncing between my devices with Nebula but maybe that’s a me issue. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I like the "inertia" of orbital-sync. 500k downloads from docker hub. More than a few contributers etc.
I understand that in pihole V6, the whole concept of syncing has been simplified, due to a proper API. This is probably also the reason for the existance of the orbital-sync "competitor" nebula-sync. Also on github. Easy to find by searching.
So, if it's not "bad" practice, would someone mind bringing up the benefits of one over the other?
As I started by writing, I consider it a benefit, that orbital sync has a larger community, making it more probable to survive and evolve... Any other thoughts?
All reactions