Skip to content

Use 'GeoIP'/'GeoLite' branding in documentation#188

Merged
horgh merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
greg/stf-555
May 29, 2026
Merged

Use 'GeoIP'/'GeoLite' branding in documentation#188
horgh merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
greg/stf-555

Conversation

@oschwald
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Updates prose/documentation to refer to the products as "GeoIP"/"GeoLite" instead of "GeoIP2"/"GeoLite2". Technical identifiers (gem name, module, .mmdb filenames, edition IDs, the geolite.info hostname, URLs) are unchanged.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

MaxMind no longer ships the legacy products, so refer to the products as
'GeoIP' and 'GeoLite' rather than 'GeoIP2'/'GeoLite2' in prose. Technical
identifiers (gem name, module, filenames, edition IDs, hostnames, URLs)
are unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates documentation, comments, and metadata across the repository to change references from 'GeoIP2' and 'GeoLite2' to 'GeoIP' and 'GeoLite'. I have no feedback to provide as there are no review comments and the changes are straightforward documentation updates.

oschwald and others added 3 commits May 29, 2026 20:35
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add a mise.toml/mise.lock pinning the language toolchain so local
development and validation match CI, consistent with our other
client libraries.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@horgh horgh merged commit c371158 into main May 29, 2026
36 checks passed
@horgh horgh deleted the greg/stf-555 branch May 29, 2026 23:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants