Replies: 6 comments 9 replies
|
These are all medical devices except possibly the reacher
Note the OBO guidance for using / reusing NCIT: Given this guidance and the fact we need to change the NCIT parent, we will create our own classes, hierarchy, and definitions. We can largely reuse the NCIT definitions with adaptations for Aristotelian form (and follow the guidance to link the term to the NCIT original. That guidance does not specify things sufficiently, so we will just use the following annotation property: http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#hasDbXref We can create “medical device” as a subclass of COB’s “device”. We can get COB’s “device” from an OBI import – see how it’s done in DrOn and OMRSE although perhaps there is no OBI import in REHABO yet. We don’t need device’s parent, we’ll just put it under BFO material entity for now medical reacher device and not just reacher device, because not all reachers are medical devices under FDA oversight. In the context of therapy, I suppose it’s still possible they are using general purpose reachers not under any FDA oversight (not even class 1 devices), but for now this will suit our purposes. In hospital settings they're likely to be FDA classified, but in private outpatient therapy settings, you're much more likely to see generic reachers sold for example at Walmart. |
|
I agree with the proposed hierarchy — grouping into locomotion, dressing, and grasping assistive devices makes good sense clinically and ontologically. I checked rehabo-edit.owl and confirmed that REHABO currently has no OBI import. Given that the plan is to create medical device as a subclass of COB's device, could you advise on the best way to bring in the COB device term — should we add an OBI import following the pattern used in DrOn and OMRSE, or would you prefer a different approach for now? |
|
Some language from the FDA statutes for help in defining 'medical device', although we are absolutely trying to define it generally for use worldwide, NOT specific to U.S. ...intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or |
|
Once we merge PR #68 we next need to add the specific device terms, beginning with locomotion assistance devices as follows: wheelchair Some proposals: |
|
I'd like to suggest we work on these terms, which would all be children of "dressing assistive device", next: Sock aid And in addition to those, "reacher", which would be a child of "grasping or holding assistive device" |
|
Sock aid |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The Pitt team requested the following assistive device terms:
Assistive devices
All reactions