Mention shared memory in using web workers#40397
Merged
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
Content:WebAPI
Contributor
|
Preview URLs (comment last updated: 2025-07-17 06:55:05) |
sideshowbarker
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2025
Co-authored-by: sideshowbarker <mike@w3.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current claim is incorrect: some data can be shared instead of copied. I added a very brief mention of
SharedArrayBuffer, but did not go into details because that would be mdn/mdn#341.I also removed an unilluminating example about "simulating copy" because it's a very bad way to demonstrate this anyway, when you already have
structuredClone.