Skip to content

221: Retroactive Codex review of merged PRs #24-#28#36

Merged
meetmousom2 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
221-retro-codex-review
May 13, 2026
Merged

221: Retroactive Codex review of merged PRs #24-#28#36
meetmousom2 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
221-retro-codex-review

Conversation

@meetmousom2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Audit deliverable for kbmd #221. PRs #24-#28 landed on main before devd PR #66 enabled adversarial Codex review by default — none got reviewed at merge time. This PR commits the retro-review report.

Followup issues filed

Test plan

  • bunx tsc --noEmit clean
  • bun test — 193 pass / 2 skip / 0 fail (run by devd-commit verify)
  • Reviewer scans the report at docs/reviews/2026-05-13-retroactive-codex.md and sanity-checks the kbmd followups exist

This is a docs-only commit — no production code changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

Audit deliverable for kbmd #221. PRs #24-#28 merged on main before
devd PR #66 enabled adversarial Codex review by default (local
scripts/devd-verify.sh stub + devd-issue.sh not passing --code-review).

Ran codex review --commit <merge-sha> against each of:
- #24 Eval harness + ground truth pipeline (2 high)
- #25 eval/types.ts Retriever interface (clean)
- #26 Python parser + import resolver (2 medium)
- #27 Go parser + import resolver (2 medium)
- #28 Competitor adapters (2 medium)

Total: 2 high, 6 medium, 0 low.

Followups filed:
- kbmd #228 - Fix eval ground-truth filter to drop Changesets release PRs
- kbmd #229 - refresh.sh single-repo path nukes all other eval/data
- kbmd #230 - Codex retro review medium findings (PRs #26/#27/#28)

No overlap with already-merged fix PRs #31 (FTS5), #32 (ranker), #33 (eval writeup).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@meetmousom2 meetmousom2 merged commit f0a6aa4 into main May 13, 2026
2 checks passed
@meetmousom2 meetmousom2 deleted the 221-retro-codex-review branch May 13, 2026 08:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant