Repository navigation
Factual review request: Mem0 2.0.19 in OAMB v0.1.0 #7318
rocke2020
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I maintain Open Agent Memory Benchmark, an independently implemented benchmark comparing self-hosted memory systems through their native APIs. The public v0.1.0 screen pins Mem0 2.0.19 at commit
dc82354e143c2581d505d581a00286d6ef8c3605. Mem0 recorded 52/60 (86.7%) and used 392,623 answer-visible context tokens, 59% fewer than Hindsight in this balanced LME-60 screen. Answer-visible context is the retrieved evidence shown to the answer model, not total provider token use or cost. OAMB does not claim a universal winner.I would value a factual review from maintainers or experienced users: does OAMB describe the 2.0.19 native API path, configuration, and version-specific limitations accurately? Please point to the exact claim and an authoritative source for any correction. I am asking for technical correction, not endorsement.
All reactions