Skip to content

refactor: simplify booting logic#279

Merged
augustoccesar merged 1 commit intonextfrom
ship/simplify-booting-logic
Apr 21, 2026
Merged

refactor: simplify booting logic#279
augustoccesar merged 1 commit intonextfrom
ship/simplify-booting-logic

Conversation

@augustoccesar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@augustoccesar augustoccesar commented Apr 21, 2026

The abstraction of BackgroudService don't seem to be as important as before now that there are only two of said services. Also they are quire rigid about how they share data, which is a problem for the new architecture that we are going through where more of the infra creation will be on the local server and then shared.

This hopefully simplifies it. The services are simple function calls that we can expand on its params and that their params are not tied into the same constraints.

Also as part of this, removed the dynamic loading for booting. This also adds to the simplification of it, but is not a blocker if we want to add the loading again instead of a "progress logging".

The abstraction of BackgroudService don't seem to be as important as before now that there are
only two of said services. Also they are quire rigid about how they share data, which is a problem
for the new architecture that we are going through where more of the infra creation will be on the
local server and then shared.

This hopefully simplifies it. The services are simple function calls that we can expand on its
params and that their params are not tied into the same constraints.

Also as part of this, removed the dynamic loading for booting. this also adds to the simplification
of it, but is not a blocker if we want to add the loading again instead of a "progress logging".
@augustoccesar augustoccesar requested a review from Druue April 21, 2026 13:48
@augustoccesar augustoccesar self-assigned this Apr 21, 2026
@augustoccesar augustoccesar merged commit c1a0297 into next Apr 21, 2026
6 checks passed
@augustoccesar augustoccesar deleted the ship/simplify-booting-logic branch April 21, 2026 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants