-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 735
[UI] Fix visibility bug in extension page #2146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: CHILKADITYA DAS <apurkahini@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @chilkaditya, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses a visibility bug on the extension page. The primary change involves updating the color of the .import-secondary class and the background color of the .chip.CONFIGURATION class in the _sass/catalog.scss file. This adjustment aims to improve the UI by ensuring elements are visible and consistent with the overall design.
Highlights
- UI Fix: Corrects a visibility issue on the extension page by modifying CSS styles.
- Color Update: Changes the text color of the
.import-secondaryclass tovar(--color-primary-qtext). - Background Color Adjustment: Modifies the background color of the
.chip.CONFIGURATIONclass tovar(--color-grey-light).
Changelog
- _sass/catalog.scss
- Updated the text color of the
.import-secondaryclass fromwhitetovar(--color-primary-qtext)on line 209. - Changed the background color of the
.chip.CONFIGURATIONclass fromvar(--action-color-light)tovar(--color-grey-light)on line 295.
- Updated the text color of the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A UI's gentle grace,
Colors aligned in their place,
Visibility clear,
No need to fear,
A smile on the user's face.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request aims to fix a visibility bug in the extension page by updating color variables in the SCSS files. The changes seem reasonable and address the issue described. However, a closer look reveals some potential areas for improvement.
Summary of Findings
- Color Contrast: Ensure sufficient color contrast between text and background, especially after the color changes, to maintain accessibility.
- Variable Usage: Verify that the correct color variables are being used and that they align with the intended design and theme (light/dark mode).
- Naming Consistency: Consider renaming
CONFIGURATIONtoconfigurationfor consistency with other class names.
Merge Readiness
The pull request addresses a specific UI bug and includes relevant screenshots. However, before merging, it's important to ensure that the color changes don't introduce any accessibility issues (e.g., insufficient contrast) and that the correct color variables are being used. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. Given the medium severity issues identified, I recommend addressing them before merging.
✅ Deploy Preview for mesheryio-preview ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
@chilkaditya Added as an agenda item to the meeting minutes |
|
Hi @vishalvivekm any problem with this pr, let me know I try to fix asap, asking because still not merged yet. |
codered-lgtm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks all good to me.
Thank you @chilkaditya 👍
|
we are merge ready here // @vishalvivekm |
Description
Images after fix :
This PR fixes #2084
Notes for Reviewers
Signed commits