Skip to content

Add ISRC / MCN API#10

Merged
JonnyJD merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
isrc_api
Apr 23, 2013
Merged

Add ISRC / MCN API#10
JonnyJD merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
isrc_api

Conversation

@JonnyJD
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@JonnyJD JonnyJD commented Apr 7, 2013

I won't do this in beta state, because this is only in libdiscid 0.3.0 (which is quite new) and there are still logical issues with that API.

There is no way yet to tell if the platform doesn't support ISRCs (with libdiscid) or there are no ISRCs on the disc.

See: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/LIB-23

@JonnyJD JonnyJD mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2013
20 tasks
JonnyJD added 2 commits April 7, 2013 14:06
We only want to read the TOC when no features are given explicitely.
This is available starting with libdiscid 0.3.0,
but we only require 0.2.2 -> try-except.

None is returned when it is not implemented or not requested.
@ghost ghost assigned JonnyJD Apr 7, 2013
@JonnyJD
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

JonnyJD commented Apr 7, 2013

With the feature API from #20 we can now implement the ISRC / MCN api. Still not sure if that should go in 1.0.0 or not.

JonnyJD added 9 commits April 8, 2013 15:31
That mapping is a good way to implement the feature enum of libdiscid
and we can also use it to create FEATURES_IMPLEMENTED on the fly.
I removed the possibility to request all features (UINT_MAX) again.
It would lead to weird behavior as phw stated.

Features that wouldn't need additional changes in this module,
other than adding the mapping should be rare and python-discid,
would get added to this module fast anyways.
It is more likely that libdiscid is older than python-discid since it is
in stable repositories for Linux and needs new builds on other
platforms.
Conflicts:
	discid.py
	doc/discid.rst
Otherwise we might indicate that ISRCs were read,
when this is impossible with put().
The difference would only be "" vs. None,
since the structure is reset in libdiscid for put().
Get the padding fix for when 1st track wouldn't be 1.
(amended manually for track_isrcs)
@JonnyJD JonnyJD merged commit 6909976 into master Apr 23, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants