FIX: Refusal Scorer Notebook#1639
Merged
Merged
Conversation
jsong468
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2026
romanlutz
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixing for integration tests: Because the default OBJECTIVE_STRICT system prompt used for refusal scorer doesn't contain explicit guidance for missing objectives, the notebook assertion when we are missing an objective fails sometimes (the scorer output is nondeterministic when we are missing the objective). I changed this test to use the NO_OBJECTIVE_STRICT system prompt which has explicit examples making the scorer return the expected answer consistently.
Tests and Documentation
Reran scorer notebooks and integration tests!