Where should capability-level evaluation evidence attach in a composed workflow?

[yuehua1213]

Agent Framework supports agents, tools, middleware, and graph workflows with checkpointing, human-in-the-loop control, and multiple providers. In a production system, that makes a single framework-level label too broad for deciding whether a reusable capability is reliable.

A failed workflow may come from one tool, one agent, routing logic, provider behavior, or environment dependencies. Recording evaluation evidence at the capability/node level—while preserving the full workflow context—could make failures and version changes easier to compare.

Does the framework have a recommended stable identifier and evidence model for attaching evaluation results to individual agents, tools, or workflow nodes across Python and .NET?