Skip to content

References to RFC2616 should probably be switched to RFC 7231 or RFC 7230 #6

@darrelmiller

Description

@darrelmiller

RFC 2616 was been replaced by RFC 7230,7231,7232,7233,7334 and 7235 two years ago and is a more consistent, accurate and clearer description of HTTP. Most of the core semantics of HTTP are described in 7231 and would be a better reference than pointing to RFC 2616

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions