Skip to content

Reword to be better reflect RFC 2119.#73

Merged
garethj-msft merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom
royshea:royshea-rfc2119-language-fix
Nov 23, 2016
Merged

Reword to be better reflect RFC 2119.#73
garethj-msft merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom
royshea:royshea-rfc2119-language-fix

Conversation

@royshea
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@royshea royshea commented Nov 14, 2016

Section 7.4.3 used the capitalized verb "MAY" without the semantics imposed by
RFC 2119. The offending phrase is simply describing a situation that can
arise in the real world, rather than a requirement of the specification. The
requirement put forth in this specification is defined in the next sentence
using the “MUST” verb.

Section 7.4.3 used the capitalized verb "MAY" without the semantics imposed by
RFC 2119.  The offending phrase is simply describing a situation that can
arise in the real world, rather than a requirement of the specification.  The
requirement put forth in this specification is defined in the next sentence
using the “MUST” verb.
@msftclas
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @royshea, I'm your friendly neighborhood Microsoft Pull Request Bot (You can call me MSBOT). Thanks for your contribution!


It looks like you're a Microsoft contributor (Roy Shea). If you're full-time, we DON'T require a Contribution License Agreement. If you are a vendor, please DO sign the electronic Contribution License Agreement. It will take 2 minutes and there's no faxing! https://cla.microsoft.com.

TTYL, MSBOT;

@garethj-msft garethj-msft merged commit 5beb5c3 into microsoft:master Nov 23, 2016
@garethj-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Good point. Merging.

garethj-msft added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2017
* Reword to be better reflect RFC 2119. (#73)

Section 7.4.3 used the capitalized verb "MAY" without the semantics imposed by
RFC 2119.  The offending phrase is simply describing a situation that can
arise in the real world, rather than a requirement of the specification.  The
requirement put forth in this specification is defined in the next sentence
using the “MUST” verb.

* Fix formatting of contibutor table (#81)

Probably caused by different markdown implementation in github.
garethj-msft pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2017
* Reword to be better reflect RFC 2119. (#73)

Section 7.4.3 used the capitalized verb "MAY" without the semantics imposed by
RFC 2119.  The offending phrase is simply describing a situation that can
arise in the real world, rather than a requirement of the specification.  The
requirement put forth in this specification is defined in the next sentence
using the “MUST” verb.

* Fix formatting of contibutor table (#81)

Probably caused by different markdown implementation in github.

* Commas moved outside the double quotes
alexmreis pushed a commit to district09/api-guidelines that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
* Reword to be better reflect RFC 2119. (microsoft#73)

Section 7.4.3 used the capitalized verb "MAY" without the semantics imposed by
RFC 2119.  The offending phrase is simply describing a situation that can
arise in the real world, rather than a requirement of the specification.  The
requirement put forth in this specification is defined in the next sentence
using the “MUST” verb.

* Fix formatting of contibutor table (microsoft#81)

Probably caused by different markdown implementation in github.

* Commas moved outside the double quotes
garethj-msft pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2018
* Reword to be better reflect RFC 2119. (#73)

Section 7.4.3 used the capitalized verb "MAY" without the semantics imposed by
RFC 2119.  The offending phrase is simply describing a situation that can
arise in the real world, rather than a requirement of the specification.  The
requirement put forth in this specification is defined in the next sentence
using the “MUST” verb.

* Fix formatting of contibutor table (#81)

Probably caused by different markdown implementation in github.

* Add link to consistency fundamentals to README

This is a quality of life add to the README to link directly to the consistency fundamentals section of the guidelines.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants