Skip to content

Upgrade SuperLU version to 7.0.0#10744

Merged
LeoMar4 merged 2 commits intomicrosoft:3.0-devfrom
jykanase:topic_SuperLU
Mar 2, 2025
Merged

Upgrade SuperLU version to 7.0.0#10744
LeoMar4 merged 2 commits intomicrosoft:3.0-devfrom
jykanase:topic_SuperLU

Conversation

@jykanase
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jykanase jykanase commented Oct 16, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

Upgrade SuperLU version to 7.0.0

Change Log

-SPECS-EXTENDED/SuperLU/SuperLU.signatures.json
-SPECS-EXTENDED/SuperLU/SuperLU.spec
-cgmanifest.json

Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology

@jykanase jykanase requested review from a team as code owners October 16, 2024 07:01
@jykanase jykanase force-pushed the topic_SuperLU branch 2 times, most recently from 2974ab9 to e782828 Compare October 16, 2024 07:14
@mfrw mfrw added specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Oct 16, 2024
@suresh-thelkar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jykanase, Can you please repush the changes so that the PR checks will run. Also verify the licenses by updating the corresponding markdown file by utilizing the script license_map.py

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@suresh-thelkar suresh-thelkar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please look into the comment I have added.

@jykanase
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

updated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@suresh-thelkar suresh-thelkar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not checkin the rpm log and test logs. Just attach them to the PR as a proof of testing.

Comment thread SPECS-EXTENDED/SuperLU/SuperLU.spec Outdated
Version: 7.0.0
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Subroutines to solve sparse linear systems
License: BSD and GPLv2+
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please use SPDX license tags.

@suresh-thelkar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Here are the buddy build results.

@jykanase jykanase marked this pull request as draft January 6, 2025 08:16
@jykanase jykanase marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2025 12:19
@LeoMar4 LeoMar4 merged commit f07579d into microsoft:3.0-dev Mar 2, 2025
binujp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2025
mayankfz pushed a commit to mayankfz/azurelinux that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants