Upgrade gupnp to 1.6.9-1#10839
Conversation
kgodara912
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good for next stage: buddy build pipeline.
kgodara912
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Buddy build. Package builds fine but installation couldn't be verified.
|
@kgodara912 What do I need to do to get this PR moving along? |
|
@kevin-b-lockwood, please check the test failures in the pipeline mentioned above. You may also run and check on your local setup as well. |
|
@kgodara912 I bumped the version to current upstream (This PR had fallen behind) and checked the build failures, they are only because we're missing part of the testing prerequisites. We've never used these prereqs that I know of, and fedora doesn't appear to consider them either. Failed tests as follows: |
a050b40 to
33bda01
Compare
|
@kevin-b-lockwood There are test failures in the buddy build. Can you check them? |

Merge Checklist
All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)
*-staticsubpackages, etc.) have had theirReleasetag incremented../cgmanifest.json,./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json,.github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json,./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md,./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)*.signatures.jsonfilessudo make go-tidy-allandsudo make go-test-coveragepassSummary
Dependent on #10790
Upgrade
gupnpto 1.6.9Change Log
gupnp, dependent ongssndpupdate.Does this affect the toolchain?
NO
Test Methodology