Skip to content

Upgrade: rubygem-hocon version to 1.4.0#11353

Open
SumitJenaHCL wants to merge 3 commits intomicrosoft:3.0-devfrom
SumitJenaHCL:topic_rubygem-hocon
Open

Upgrade: rubygem-hocon version to 1.4.0#11353
SumitJenaHCL wants to merge 3 commits intomicrosoft:3.0-devfrom
SumitJenaHCL:topic_rubygem-hocon

Conversation

@SumitJenaHCL
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL commented Dec 8, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
This PR is to upgrade the package rubygem-hocon to version 1.4.0

Change Log
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/rubygem-hocon/rubygem-hocon.signatures.json
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/rubygem-hocon/rubygem-hocon.spec
  • cgmanifest.json
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • Local Build

@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL requested review from a team as code owners December 8, 2024 21:17
@SumitJenaHCL
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This PR is raised to successfully merge #11360

@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL marked this pull request as draft January 2, 2025 10:49
@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2025 11:25
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kgodara912 kgodara912 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good for next stage: buddy build pipeline.

@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL requested a review from kgodara912 July 23, 2025 04:34
@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL force-pushed the topic_rubygem-hocon branch from dfb3f01 to db2a372 Compare July 23, 2025 07:21
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service Bot added Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Jul 23, 2025
@sandeepkarambelkar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sandeepkarambelkar commented Aug 19, 2025

%{buildroot}%{gem_dir}/
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
mv %{buildroot}%{gem_instdir}/bin/hocon %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/hocon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check section?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants