Added package rubygem-racc to SPECS-EXTENDED

[SumitJenaHCL]

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

• The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
• The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
• Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
• Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
• Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
• All package sources are available
• cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
• LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
• All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
• sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
• Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
• Ready to merge

---

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
This PR is to add package rubygem-racc to SPECS-EXTENDED

Change Log

• SPECS-EXTENDED/rubygem-racc/racc-create-tarball-missing-files.sh
• SPECS-EXTENDED/rubygem-racc/rubygem-racc.signatures.json
• SPECS-EXTENDED/rubygem-racc/rubygem-racc.spec
• cgmanifest.json

Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues

• #xxxx

Links to CVEs

• https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-YYYY-XXXX

Test Methodology

• Local Build

[SumitJenaHCL]

This PR is raised to successfully merge #11360

[kgodara912]

This file is local only, do we need signature for this?

[SumitJenaHCL]

Can't find a way to fetch the tarball with the latest commit. So, resorted to just add the script as the source to generate the tarball. Could it be possible to run it during setting up the pipeline.

[kgodara912]

Instead of git cloning as pipeline/build system may not have access to external internet transaction (also security), could you please check alternative to keep missing files downloaded to blob storage?

[SumitJenaHCL]

The script is to fetch the latest changes from the upstream. Can't find a way to fetch the tarball with the latest commit. So, resorted to just add the script as the source to generate the tarball. Could it be possible to run it during setting up the pipeline.