Conversation
| Name: frr | ||
| Version: 9.1.1 | ||
| Release: 5%{?dist} | ||
| Version: 10.5.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a pretty big jump.
Can we please run a full build to confirm. both for x86_64 & ARM64
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have tested image on some LISA tests as well:
verify_openssl_basic
verify_fips_enablement
mfrw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM given the full build is green
|
As we have bug for this, please ensure that bug is approved and then we can merge it. |
|
@kgodara912 Which bug? are you asking about the work item? |
|
Yes, work item will require stable review before merging with signoff. |
|
There are multiple changes introduced with this much big jump which may break behavior or api by this upgrade. AI summary also says that it may cause outages, ✅ Yes, there are significant breaking changes from 9.1 → 10.5. AS_SET rejection |
|
Update: Waiting for customer signoff |
Merge Checklist
All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)
*-staticsubpackages, etc.) have had theirReleasetag incremented../cgmanifest.json,./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json,.github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json,./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md,./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)*.signatures.jsonfilessudo make go-tidy-allandsudo make go-test-coveragepassSummary
What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
Customer Request
Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?
NO
Work Item: Link
Test Methodology