Upgrade irqbalance to 1.9.5 and add patches to fix ENOSPC handling#16746
Conversation
a6c9ee9 to
b448d36
Compare
|
@microsoft/cbl-mariner-stable-maintainers, Could you please help review this PR? We are planning to include it in the upcoming monthly release, hence requesting a priority review. |
|
Buddy build after recent force push. |
|
Marking this PR as a draft for now to test an edge case identified which does not come in normal scenarios. |
b448d36 to
6bf2d09
Compare
|
Buddy build results after the recent push to GitHub are given below. |
|
Note on PR Checks: One of the ptests for libguestfs is failing, which is a known issue and not related to irqbalance. |
kgodara912
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Patch matched with both the upstream merged PRs of irqbalancer. The analysis of patch with AI says that the patch is good. The extra changes are few corner cases in original patch and are accepted at upstream quickly. Buddy build is successful.
thanks for the review and sign off. |
|
thank you very much for the review and approval. I will merge this PR shortly. |
Merge Checklist
All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)
*-staticsubpackages, etc.) have had theirReleasetag incremented../cgmanifest.json,./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json,.github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json,./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md,./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)*.signatures.jsonfilessudo make go-tidy-allandsudo make go-test-coveragepassSummary
What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?
NO
Associated issues
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology